Assigning a new entigen to a word group

ABSTRACT

A method executed by a computing device includes obtaining a string of words and determining whether two or more words of the string of words are in a word group. When the two or more words are in the word group, the method further includes determining a set of identigens for each word of the word group to produce sets of identigens, where a set of identigens of the sets of identigens represents one or more different meanings of a word of the word group. The method further includes interpreting, using identigen pairing rules, the sets of identigens to produce an entigen group. The method further includes assigning a new entigen to represent the entigen group, where the new entigen represents a most likely meaning interpretation of the word group.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENTS

The present U.S. Utility Patent Applications claims priority pursuant to35 U.S.C. § 120 as a continuation of U.S. Utility application Ser. No.16/455,492, entitled “GENERATING FURTHER KNOWLEDGE TO PROCESS QUERY,”filed Jun. 27, 2019, issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 10,942,919 on Mar. 9,2021, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S.Provisional Application No. 62/691,703, entitled “VERIFYING KNOWLEDGEEXTRACTION FROM CONTENT,” filed Jun. 29, 2018, all of which are herebyincorporated herein by reference in their entirety and made part of thepresent U.S. Utility Patent Application for all purposes.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable

INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC

Not Applicable

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Technical Field of the Invention

This invention relates to computing systems and more particularly togenerating data representations of data and analyzing the data utilizingthe data representations.

Description of Related Art

It is known that data is stored in information systems, such as filescontaining text. It is often difficult to produce useful informationfrom this stored data due to many factors. The factors include thevolume of available data, accuracy of the data, and variances in howtext is interpreted to express knowledge. For example, many languagesand regional dialects utilize the same or similar words to representdifferent concepts.

Computers are known to utilize pattern recognition techniques and applystatistical reasoning to process text to express an interpretation in anattempt to overcome ambiguities inherent in words. One patternrecognition technique includes matching a word pattern of a query to aword pattern of the stored data to find an explicit textual answer.Another pattern recognition technique classifies words into majorgrammatical types such as functional words, nouns, adjectives, verbs andadverbs. Grammar based techniques then utilize these grammatical typesto study how words should be distributed within a string of words toform a properly constructed grammatical sentence where each word isforced to support a grammatical operation without necessarilyidentifying what the word is actually trying to describe.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computingsystem in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of various serversof a computing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of various devicesof a computing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 4A and 4B are schematic block diagrams of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 4C is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for interpretingcontent to produce a response to a query within a computing system inaccordance with the present invention;

FIG. 5A is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a collectionsmodule of a computing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 5B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for obtainingcontent within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 5C is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a query moduleof a computing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 5D is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for providing aresponse to a query within a computing system in accordance with thepresent invention;

FIG. 5E is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of an identigenentigen intelligence (WI) module of a computing system in accordancewith the present invention;

FIG. 5F is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for analyzingcontent within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 6A is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of an elementidentification module and an interpretation module of a computing systemin accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 6B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for interpretinginformation within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 6C is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of an answerresolution module of a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 6D is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for producing ananswer within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 7A is an information flow diagram for interpreting informationwithin a computing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7B is a relationship block diagram illustrating an embodiment ofrelationships between things and representations of things within acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7C is a diagram of an embodiment of a synonym words table within acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7D is a diagram of an embodiment of a polysemous words table withina computing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7E is a diagram of an embodiment of transforming words intogroupings within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 8A is a data flow diagram for accumulating knowledge within acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 8B is a diagram of an embodiment of a groupings table within acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 8C is a data flow diagram for answering questions utilizingaccumulated knowledge within a computing system in accordance with thepresent invention;

FIG. 8D is a data flow diagram for answering questions utilizinginterference within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 8E is a relationship block diagram illustrating another embodimentof relationships between things and representations of things within acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 8F and 8G are schematic block diagrams of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 8H is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for processingcontent to produce knowledge within a computing system in accordancewith the present invention;

FIGS. 8J and 8K are schematic block diagrams another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 8L is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for generating aquery response to a query within a computing system in accordance withthe present invention;

FIG. 9A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 9B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for verifyingknowledge extraction from content within a computing system inaccordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 10A-10D are schematic block diagrams of another embodiment of acomputing system illustrating an embodiment of a method for processing aquery in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 10E is a data structure diagram of an example of a further updatedanswer entigen group in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 11A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 11B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for detectingan unfavorable security condition within a computing system inaccordance with the present invention;

FIG. 12A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 12B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for optimizingknowledge extraction within a computing system in accordance with thepresent invention;

FIG. 13A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 13B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for performingan analysis within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 14A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 14B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forrepresenting numbers in a knowledge base within a computing system inaccordance with the present invention;

FIG. 15A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 15B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for processingan unknown word within a computing system in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 16A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 16B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forrepresenting mathematical symbols within a computing system inaccordance with the present invention;

FIG. 17A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of a contentingestion module within a computing system in accordance with thepresent invention;

FIG. 17B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forfacilitating subsequent rapid phrase detection within a computing systemin accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 18A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of aninterpretation module within a computing system in accordance with thepresent invention; and

FIG. 18B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forrepresenting a boolean expression within a computing system inaccordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computingsystem 10 that includes a plurality of user devices 12-1 through 12-N, aplurality of wireless user devices 14-1 through 14-N, a plurality ofcontent sources 16-1 through 16-N, a plurality of transactional servers18-1 through 18-N, a plurality of artificial intelligence (AI) servers20-1 through 20-N, and a core network 24. The core network 24 includesat least one of the Internet, a public radio access network (RAN), andany private network. Hereafter, the computing system 10 may beinterchangeably referred to as a data network, a data communicationnetwork, a system, a communication system, and a data communicationsystem. Hereafter, the user device and the wireless user device may beinterchangeably referred to as user devices, and each of thetransactional servers and the AI servers may be interchangeably referredto as servers.

Each user device, wireless user device, transactional server, and AIserver includes a computing device that includes a computing core. Ingeneral, a computing device is any electronic device that cancommunicate data, process data, and/or store data. A further generalityof a computing device is that it includes one or more of a centralprocessing unit (CPU), a memory system, a sensor (e.g., internal orexternal), user input/output interfaces, peripheral device interfaces,communication elements, and an interconnecting bus structure.

As further specific examples, each of the computing devices may be aportable computing device and/or a fixed computing device. A portablecomputing device may be an embedded controller, a smart sensor, a smartpill, a social networking device, a gaming device, a cell phone, a smartphone, a robot, a personal digital assistant, a digital music player, adigital video player, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet,a video game controller, an engine controller, a vehicular controller,an aircraft controller, a maritime vessel controller, and/or any otherportable device that includes a computing core. A fixed computing devicemay be security camera, a sensor device, a household appliance, amachine, a robot, an embedded controller, a personal computer (PC), acomputer server, a cable set-top box, a satellite receiver, a televisionset, a printer, a fax machine, home entertainment equipment, a cameracontroller, a video game console, a critical infrastructure controller,and/or any type of home or office computing equipment that includes acomputing core. An embodiment of the various servers is discussed ingreater detail with reference to FIG. 2 . An embodiment of the variousdevices is discussed in greater detail with reference to FIG. 3 .

Each of the content sources 16-1 through 16-N includes any source ofcontent, where the content includes one or more of data files, a datastream, a tech stream, a text file, an audio stream, an audio file, avideo stream, a video file, etc. Examples of the content sources includea weather service, a multi-language online dictionary, a fact server, abig data storage system, the Internet, social media systems, an emailserver, a news server, a schedule server, a traffic monitor, a securitycamera system, audio monitoring equipment, an information server, aservice provider, a data aggregator, and airline traffic server, ashipping and logistics server, a banking server, a financial transactionserver, etc. Alternatively, or in addition to, one or more of thevarious user devices may provide content. For example, a wireless userdevice may provide content (e.g., issued as a content message) when thewireless user device is able to capture data (e.g., text input, sensorinput, etc.).

Generally, an embodiment of this invention presents solutions where thecomputing system 10 supports the generation and utilization of knowledgeextracted from content. For example, the AI servers 20-1 through 20-Ningest content from the content sources 16-1 through 16-N by receiving,via the core network 24 content messages 28-1 through 28-N as AImessages 32-1 through 32-N, extract the knowledge from the ingestedcontent, and interact with the various user devices to utilize theextracted knowledge by facilitating the issuing, via the core network24, user messages 22-1 through 22-N to the user devices 12-1 through12-N and wireless signals 26-1 through 26-N to the wireless user devices14-1 through 14-N.

Each content message 28-1 through 28-N includes a content request (e.g.,requesting content related to a topic, content type, content timing, oneor more domains, etc.) or a content response, where the content responseincludes real-time or static content such as one or more of dictionaryinformation, facts, non-facts, weather information, sensor data, newsinformation, blog information, social media content, user daily activityschedules, traffic conditions, community event schedules, schoolschedules, user schedules airline records, shipping records, logisticsrecords, banking records, census information, global financial historyinformation, etc. Each AI message 32-1 through 32-N includes one or moreof content messages, user messages (e.g., a query request, a queryresponse that includes an answer to a query request), and transactionmessages (e.g., transaction information, requests and responses relatedto transactions). Each user message 22-1 through 22-N includes one ormore of a query request, a query response, a trigger request, a triggerresponse, a content collection, control information, softwareinformation, configuration information, security information, routinginformation, addressing information, presence information, analyticsinformation, protocol information, all types of media, sensor data,statistical data, user data, error messages, etc.

When utilizing a wireless signal capability of the core network 24, eachof the wireless user devices 14-1 through 14-N encodes/decodes dataand/or information messages (e.g., user messages such as user messages22-1 through 22-N) in accordance with one or more wireless standards forlocal wireless data signals (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ZigBee) and/or forwide area wireless data signals (e.g., 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, satellite,point-to-point, etc.) to produce wireless signals 26-1 through 26-N.Having encoded/decoded the data and/or information messages, thewireless user devices 14-1 through 14-N and/receive the wireless signalsto/from the wireless capability of the core network 24.

As another example of the generation and utilization of knowledge, thetransactional servers 18-1 through 18-N communicate, via the corenetwork 24, transaction messages 30-1 through 30-N as further AImessages 32-1 through 32-N to facilitate ingesting of transactional typecontent (e.g., real-time crypto currency transaction information) and tofacilitate handling of utilization of the knowledge by one or more ofthe transactional servers (e.g., for a transactional function) inaddition to the utilization of the knowledge by the various userdevices. Each transaction message 30-1 through 30-N includes one or moreof a query request, a query response, a trigger request, a triggerresponse, a content message, and transactional information, where thetransactional information may include one or more of consumer purchasinghistory, crypto currency ledgers, stock market trade information, otherinvestment transaction information, etc.

In another specific example of operation of the generation andutilization of knowledge extracted from the content, the user device12-1 issues a user message 22-1 to the AI server 20-1, where the usermessage 22-1 includes a query request and where the query requestincludes a question related to a first domain of knowledge. The issuingincludes generating the user message 22-1 based on the query request(e.g., the question), selecting the AI server 20-1 based on the firstdomain of knowledge, and sending, via the core network 24, the usermessage 22-1 as a further AI message 32-1 to the AI server 20-1. Havingreceived the AI message 32-1, the AI server 20-1 analyzes the questionwithin the first domain, generates further knowledge, generates apreliminary answer, generates a quality level indicator of thepreliminary answer, and determines to gather further content when thequality level indicator is below a minimum quality threshold level.

When gathering the further content, the AI server 20-1 issues, via thecore network 24, a still further AI message 32-1 as a further contentmessage 28-1 to the content source 16-1, where the content message 28-1includes a content request for more content associated with the firstdomain of knowledge and in particular the question. Alternatively, or inaddition to, the AI server 20-1 issues the content request to another AIserver to facilitate a response within a domain associated with theother AI server. Further alternatively, or in addition to, the AI server20-1 issues the content request to one or more of the various userdevices to facilitate a response from a subject matter expert.

Having received the content message 28-1, the contents or 16-1 issues,via the core network 24, a still further content message 28-1 to the AIserver 20-1 as a yet further AI message 32-1, where the still furthercontent message 28-1 includes requested content. The AI server 20-1processes the received content to generate further knowledge. Havinggenerated the further knowledge, the AI server 20-1 re-analyzes thequestion, generates still further knowledge, generates anotherpreliminary answer, generates another quality level indicator of theother preliminary answer, and determines to issue a query response tothe user device 12-1 when the quality level indicator is above theminimum quality threshold level. When issuing the query response, the AIserver 20-1 generates an AI message 32-1 that includes another usermessage 22-1, where the other user message 22-1 includes the otherpreliminary answer as a query response including the answer to thequestion. Having generated the AI message 32-1, the AI server 20-1sends, via the core network 24, the AI message 32-1 as the user message22-1 to the user device 12-1 thus providing the answer to the originalquestion of the query request.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the AI servers20-1 through 20-N and the transactional servers 18-1 through 18-N of thecomputing system 10 of FIG. 1 . The servers include a computing core 52,one or more visual output devices 74 (e.g., video graphics display,touchscreen, LED, etc.), one or more user input devices 76 (e.g.,keypad, keyboard, touchscreen, voice to text, a push button, amicrophone, a card reader, a door position switch, a biometric inputdevice, etc.), one or more audio output devices 78 (e.g., speaker(s),headphone jack, a motor, etc.), and one or more visual input devices 80(e.g., a still image camera, a video camera, photocell, etc.).

The servers further include one or more universal serial bus (USB)devices (USB devices 1-U), one or more peripheral devices (e.g.,peripheral devices 1-P), one or more memory devices (e.g., one or moreflash memory devices 92, one or more hard drive (HD) memories 94, andone or more solid state (SS) memory devices 96, and/or cloud memory 98).The servers further include one or more wireless location modems 84(e.g., global positioning satellite (GPS), Wi-Fi, angle of arrival, timedifference of arrival, signal strength, dedicated wireless location,etc.), one or more wireless communication modems 86-1 through 86-N(e.g., a cellular network transceiver, a wireless data networktransceiver, a Wi-Fi transceiver, a Bluetooth transceiver, a 315 MHztransceiver, a zig bee transceiver, a 60 GHz transceiver, etc.), a telcointerface 102 (e.g., to interface to a public switched telephonenetwork), and a wired local area network (LAN) 88 (e.g., optical,electrical), and a wired wide area network (WAN) 90 (e.g., optical,electrical).

The computing core 52 includes a video graphics module 54, one or moreprocessing modules 50-1 through 50-N (e.g., which may include one ormore secure co-processors), a memory controller 56 and one or more mainmemories 58-1 through 58-N (e.g., RAM serving as local memory). Thecomputing core 52 further includes one or more input/output (I/O) deviceinterfaces 62, an input/output (I/O) controller 60, a peripheralinterface 64, one or more USB interfaces 66, one or more networkinterfaces 72, one or more memory interfaces 70, and/or one or moreperipheral device interfaces 68.

The processing modules may be a single processing device or a pluralityof processing devices where the processing device may further bereferred to as one or more of a “processing circuit”, a “processor”,and/or a “processing unit”. Such a processing device may be amicroprocessor, micro-controller, digital signal processor,microcomputer, central processing unit, field programmable gate array,programmable logic device, state machine, logic circuitry, analogcircuitry, digital circuitry, and/or any device that manipulates signals(analog and/or digital) based on hard coding of the circuitry and/oroperational instructions.

The processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processingunit may be, or further include, memory and/or an integrated memoryelement, which may be a single memory device, a plurality of memorydevices, and/or embedded circuitry of another processing module, module,processing circuit, and/or processing unit. Such a memory device may bea read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatilememory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory,and/or any device that stores digital information. Note that if theprocessing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unitincludes more than one processing device, the processing devices may becentrally located (e.g., directly coupled together via a wired and/orwireless bus structure) or may be distributedly located (e.g., cloudcomputing via indirect coupling via a local area network and/or a widearea network).

Further note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit,and/or processing unit implements one or more of its functions via astate machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logiccircuitry, the memory and/or memory element storing the correspondingoperational instructions may be embedded within, or external to, thecircuitry comprising the state machine, analog circuitry, digitalcircuitry, and/or logic circuitry. Still further note that, the memoryelement may store, and the processing module, module, processingcircuit, and/or processing unit executes, hard coded and/or operationalinstructions corresponding to at least some of the steps and/orfunctions illustrated in one or more of the Figures. Such a memorydevice or memory element can be included in an article of manufacture.

Each of the interfaces 62, 66, 68, 70, and 72 includes a combination ofhardware (e.g., connectors, wiring, etc.) and may further includeoperational instructions stored on memory (e.g., driver software) thatare executed by one or more of the processing modules 50-1 through 50-Nand/or a processing circuit within the interface. Each of the interfacescouples to one or more components of the servers. For example, one ofthe IO device interfaces 62 couples to an audio output device 78. Asanother example, one of the memory interfaces 70 couples to flash memory92 and another one of the memory interfaces 70 couples to cloud memory98 (e.g., an on-line storage system and/or on-line backup system). Inother embodiments, the servers may include more or less devices andmodules than shown in this example embodiment of the servers.

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the variousdevices of the computing system 10 of FIG. 1 , including the userdevices 12-1 through 12-N and the wireless user devices 14-1 through14-N. The various devices include the visual output device 74 of FIG. 2, the user input device 76 of FIG. 2 , the audio output device 78 ofFIG. 2 , the visual input device 80 of FIG. 2 , and one or more sensors82.

The sensor may implemented internally and/or externally to the device.Example sensors includes a still camera, a video camera, servo motorsassociated with a camera, a position detector, a smoke detector, a gasdetector, a motion sensor, an accelerometer, velocity detector, acompass, a gyro, a temperature sensor, a pressure sensor, an altitudesensor, a humidity detector, a moisture detector, an imaging sensor, anda biometric sensor. Further examples of the sensor include an infraredsensor, an audio sensor, an ultrasonic sensor, a proximity detector, amagnetic field detector, a biomaterial detector, a radiation detector, aweight detector, a density detector, a chemical analysis detector, afluid flow volume sensor, a DNA reader, a wind speed sensor, a winddirection sensor, and an object detection sensor.

Further examples of the sensor include an object identifier sensor, amotion recognition detector, a battery level detector, a roomtemperature sensor, a sound detector, a smoke detector, an intrusiondetector, a motion detector, a door position sensor, a window positionsensor, and a sunlight detector. Still further sensor examples includemedical category sensors including: a pulse rate monitor, a heart rhythmmonitor, a breathing detector, a blood pressure monitor, a blood glucoselevel detector, blood type, an electrocardiogram sensor, a body massdetector, an imaging sensor, a microphone, body temperature, etc.

The various devices further include the computing core 52 of FIG. 2 ,the one or more universal serial bus (USB) devices (USB devices 1-U) ofFIG. 2 , the one or more peripheral devices (e.g., peripheral devices1-P) of FIG. 2 , and the one or more memories of FIG. 2 (e.g., flashmemories 92, HD memories 94, SS memories 96, and/or cloud memories 98).The various devices further include the one or more wireless locationmodems 84 of FIG. 2 , the one or more wireless communication modems 86-1through 86-N of FIG. 2 , the telco interface 102 of FIG. 2 , the wiredlocal area network (LAN) 88 of FIG. 2 , and the wired wide area network(WAN) 90 of FIG. 2 . In other embodiments, the various devices mayinclude more or less internal devices and modules than shown in thisexample embodiment of the various devices.

FIGS. 4A and 4B are schematic block diagrams of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes one or more of the user device 12-1 ofFIG. 1 , the wireless user device 14-1 of FIG. 1 , the content source16-1 of FIG. 1 , the transactional server 18-1 of FIG. 1 , the userdevice 12-2 of FIG. 1 , and the AI server 20-1 of FIG. 1 . The AI server20-1 includes the processing module 50-1 (e.g., associated with theservers) of FIG. 2 , where the processing module 50-1 includes acollections module 120, an identigen entigen intelligence (WI) module122, and a query module 124. Alternatively, the collections module 120,the LEI module 122, and the query module 124 may be implemented by theprocessing module 50-1 (e.g., associated with the various user devices)of FIG. 3 . The computing system functions to interpret content toproduce a response to a query.

FIG. 4A illustrates an example of the interpreting of the content toproduce the response to the query where the collections module 120interprets (e.g., based on an interpretation approach such as rules) atleast one of a collections request 132 from the query module 124 and acollections request within collections information 130 from the LEImodule 122 to produce content request information (e.g., potentialsources, content descriptors of desired content). Alternatively, or inaddition to, the collections module 120 may facilitate gathering furthercontent based on a plurality of collection requests from a plurality ofdevices of the computing system 10 of FIG. 1 .

The collections request 132 is utilized to facilitate collection ofcontent, where the content may be received in a real-time fashion onceor at desired intervals, or in a static fashion from previous discretetime frames. For instance, the query module 124 issues the collectionsrequest 132 to facilitate collection of content as a background activityto support a long-term query (e.g., how many domestic airline flightsover the next seven days include travelers between the age of 18 and 35years old). The collections request 132 may include one or more of arequester identifier (ID), a content type (e.g., language, dialect,media type, topic, etc.), a content source indicator, securitycredentials (e.g., an authorization level, a password, a user ID,parameters utilized for encryption, etc.), a desired content qualitylevel, trigger information (e.g., parameters under which to collectcontent based on a pre-event, an event (i.e., content quality levelreaches a threshold to cause the trigger, trueness), or a timeframe), adesired format, and a desired timing associated with the content.

Having interpreted the collections request 132, the collections module120 selects a source of content based on the content requestinformation. The selecting includes one or more of identifying one ormore potential sources based on the content request information,selecting the source of content from the potential sources utilizing aselection approach (e.g., favorable history, a favorable security level,favorable accessibility, favorable cost, favorable performance, etc.).For example, the collections module 120 selects the content source 16-1when the content source 16-1 is known to provide a favorable contentquality level for a domain associated with the collections request 132.

Having selected the source of content, the collections module 120 issuesa content request 126 to the selected source of content. The issuingincludes generating the content request 126 based on the content requestinformation for the selected source of content and sending the contentrequest 126 to the selected source of content. The content request 126may include one or more of a content type indicator, a requester ID,security credentials for content access, and any other informationassociated with the collections request 132. For example, thecollections module 120 sends the content request 126, via the corenetwork 24 of FIG. 1 , to the content source 16-1. Alternatively, or inaddition to, the collections module 120 may send a similar contentrequest 126 to one or more of the user device 12-1, the wireless userdevice 14-1, and the transactional server 18-1 to facilitate collectingof further content.

In response to the content request 126, the collections module 120receives one or more content responses 128. The content response 128includes one or more of content associated with the content source, acontent source identifier, security credential processing information,and any other information pertaining to the desired content. Havingreceived the content response 128, the collections module 120 interpretsthe received content response 128 to produce collections information130, where the collections information 130 further includes acollections response from the collections module 120 to the IEI module122.

The collections response includes one or more of transformed content(e.g., completed sentences and paragraphs), timing informationassociated with the content, a content source ID, and a content qualitylevel. Having generated the collections response of the collectionsinformation 130, the collections module 120 sends the collectionsinformation 130 to the IEI module 122. Having received the collectionsinformation 130 from the collections module 120, the IEI module 122interprets the further content of the content response to generatefurther knowledge, where the further knowledge is stored in a memoryassociated with the IEI module 122 to facilitate subsequent answering ofquestions posed in received queries.

FIG. 4B further illustrates the example of the interpreting of thecontent to produce the response to the query where, the query module 124interprets a received query request 136 from a requester to produce aninterpretation of the query request. For example, the query module 124receives the query request 136 from the user device 12-2, and/or fromone or more of the wireless user device 14-2 and the transactionalserver 18-2. The query request 136 includes one or more of an identifier(ID) associated with the request (e.g., requester ID, ID of an entity tosend a response to), a question, question constraints (e.g., within atimeframe, within a geographic area, within a domain of knowledge,etc.), and content associated with the question (e.g., which may beanalyzed for new knowledge itself).

The interpreting of the query request 136 includes determining whetherto issue a request to the IEI module 122 (e.g., a question, perhaps withcontent) and/or to issue a request to the collections module 120 (e.g.,for further background content). For example, the query module 124produces the interpretation of the query request to indicate to send therequest directly to the IEI module 122 when the question is associatedwith a simple non-time varying function answer (e.g., question: “howmany hydrogen atoms does a molecule of water have?”).

Having interpreted the query request 136, the query module 124 issues atleast one of an IEI request as query information 138 to the IEI module122 (e.g., when receiving a simple new query request) and a collectionsrequest 132 to the collections module 120 (e.g., based on two or morequery requests 136 requiring more substantive content gathering). TheIEI request of the query information 138 includes one or more of anidentifier (ID) of the query module 124, an ID of the requester (e.g.,the user device 12-2), a question (e.g., with regards to content foranalysis, with regards to knowledge minded by the AI server from generalcontent), one or more constraints (e.g., assumptions, restrictions,etc.) associated with the question, content for analysis of thequestion, and timing information (e.g., a date range for relevance ofthe question).

Having received the query information 138 that includes the IEI requestfrom the query module 124, the IEI module 122 determines whether asatisfactory response can be generated based on currently availableknowledge, including that of the query request 136. The determiningincludes indicating that the satisfactory response cannot be generatedwhen an estimated quality level of an answer falls below a minimumquality threshold level. When the satisfactory response cannot begenerated, the IEI module 122 facilitates collecting more content. Thefacilitating includes issuing a collections request to the collectionsmodule 120 of the AI server 20-1 and/or to another server or userdevice, and interpreting a subsequent collections response 134 ofcollections information 130 that includes further content to producefurther knowledge to enable a more favorable answer.

When the IEI module 122 indicates that the satisfactory response can begenerated, the IEI module 122 issues an IEI response as queryinformation 138 to the query module 124. The IEI response includes oneor more of one or more answers, timing relevance of the one or moreanswers, an estimated quality level of each answer, and one or moreassumptions associated with the answer. The issuing includes generatingthe IEI response based on the collections response 134 of thecollections information 130 and the IEI request, and sending the IEIresponse as the query information 138 to the query module 124.Alternatively, or in addition to, at least some of the further contentcollected by the collections module 120 is utilized to generate acollections response 134 issued by the collections module 120 to thequery module 124. The collections response 134 includes one or more offurther content, a content availability indicator (e.g., when, where,required credentials, etc.), a content freshness indicator (e.g.,timestamps, predicted time availability), content source identifiers,and a content quality level.

Having received the query information 138 from the IEI module 122, thequery module 124 issues a query response 140 to the requester based onthe IEI response and/or the collections response 134 directly from thecollections module 120, where the collection module 120 generates thecollections response 134 based on collected content and the collectionsrequest 132. The query response 140 includes one or more of an answer,answer timing, an answer quality level, and answer assumptions.

FIG. 4C is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for interpretingcontent to produce a response to a query within a computing system. Inparticular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one ormore functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-3,4A-4B, and also FIG. 4C. The method includes step 150 where acollections module of a processing module of one or more computingdevices (e.g., of one or more servers) interprets a collections requestto produce content request information. The interpreting may include oneor more of identifying a desired content source, identifying a contenttype, identifying a content domain, and identifying content timingrequirements.

The method continues at step 152 where the collections module selects asource of content based on the content request information. For example,the collections module identifies one or more potential sources based onthe content request information and selects the source of content fromthe potential sources utilizing a selection approach (e.g., based on oneor more of favorable history, a favorable security level, favorableaccessibility, favorable cost, favorable performance, etc.). The methodcontinues at step 154 where the collections module issues a contentrequest to the selected source of content. The issuing includesgenerating a content request based on the content request informationfor the selected source of content and sending the content request tothe selected source of content.

The method continues at step 156 where the collections module issuescollections information to an identigen entigen intelligence (IEI)module based on a received content response, where the IEI moduleextracts further knowledge from newly obtained content from the one ormore received content responses. For example, the collections modulegenerates the collections information based on newly obtained contentfrom the one or more received content responses of the selected sourceof content.

The method continues at step 158 where a query module interprets areceived query request from a requester to produce an interpretation ofthe query request. The interpreting may include determining whether toissue a request to the IEI module (e.g., a question) or to issue arequest to the collections module to gather further background content.The method continues at step 160 where the query module issues a furthercollections request. For example, when receiving a new query request,the query module generates a request for the IEI module. As anotherexample, when receiving a plurality of query requests for similarquestions, the query module generates a request for the collectionsmodule to gather further background content.

The method continues at step 162 where the IEI module determines whethera satisfactory query response can be generated when receiving therequest from the query module. For example, the IEI module indicatesthat the satisfactory query response cannot be generated when anestimated quality level of an answer is below a minimum answer qualitythreshold level. The method branches to step 166 when the IEI moduledetermines that the satisfactory query response can be generated. Themethod continues to step 164 when the IEI module determines that thesatisfactory query response cannot be generated. When the satisfactoryquery response cannot be generated, the method continues at step 164where the IEI module facilitates collecting more content. The methodloops back to step 150.

When the satisfactory query response can be generated, the methodcontinues at step 166 where the IEI module issues an IEI response to thequery module. The issuing includes generating the IEI response based onthe collections response and the IEI request, and sending the IEIresponse to the query module. The method continues at step 168 where thequery module issues a query response to the requester. For example, thequery module generates the query response based on the IEI responseand/or a collections response from the collections module and sends thequery response to the requester, where the collections module generatesthe collections response based on collected content and the collectionsrequest.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 5A is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the collectionsmodule 120 of FIG. 4A that includes a content acquisition module 180, acontent selection module 182, a source selection module 184, a contentsecurity module 186, an acquisition timing module 188, a contenttransformation module 190, and a content quality module 192. Generally,an embodiment of this invention presents solutions where the collectionsmodule 120 supports collecting content.

In an example of operation of the collecting of the content, the contentacquisition module 180 receives a collections request 132 from arequester. The content acquisition module 180 obtains content selectioninformation 194 based on the collections request 132. The contentselection information 194 includes one or more of content requirements,a desired content type indicator, a desired content source identifier, acontent type indicator, a candidate source identifier (ID), and acontent profile (e.g., a template of typical parameters of the content).For example, the content acquisition module 180 receives the contentselection information 194 from the content selection module 182, wherethe content selection module 182 generates the content selectioninformation 194 based on a content selection information request fromthe content acquisition module 180 and where the content acquisitionmodule 180 generates the content selection information request based onthe collections request 132.

The content acquisition module 180 obtains source selection information196 based on the collections request 132. The source selectioninformation 196 includes one or more of candidate source identifiers, acontent profile, selected sources, source priority levels, andrecommended source access timing. For example, the content acquisitionmodule 180 receives the source selection information 196 from the sourceselection module 184, where the source selection module 184 generatesthe source selection information 196 based on a source selectioninformation request from the content acquisition module 180 and wherethe content acquisition module 180 generates the source selectioninformation request based on the collections request 132.

The content acquisition module 180 obtains acquisition timinginformation 200 based on the collections request 132. The acquisitiontiming information 200 includes one or more of recommended source accesstiming, confirmed source access timing, source access testing results,estimated velocity of content update's, content precious, timestamps,predicted time availability, required content acquisition triggers,content acquisition trigger detection indicators, and a duplicativeindicator with a pending content request. For example, the contentacquisition module 180 receives the acquisition timing information 200from the acquisition timing module 188, where the acquisition timingmodule 188 generates the acquisition timing information 200 based on anacquisition timing information request from the content acquisitionmodule 180 and where the content acquisition module 180 generates theacquisition timing information request based on the collections request132.

Having obtained the content selection information 194, the sourceselection information 196, and the acquisition timing information 200,the content acquisition module 180 issues a content request 126 to acontent source utilizing security information 198 from the contentsecurity module 186, where the content acquisition module 180 generatesthe content request 126 in accordance with the content selectioninformation 194, the source selection information 196, and theacquisition timing information 200. The security information 198includes one or more of source priority requirements, requester securityinformation, available security procedures, and security credentials fortrust and/or encryption. For example, the content acquisition module 180generates the content request 126 to request a particular content typein accordance with the content selection information 194 and to includesecurity parameters of the security information 198, initiates sendingof the content request 126 in accordance with the acquisition timinginformation 200, and sends the content request 126 to a particulartargeted content source in accordance with the source selectioninformation 196.

In response to receiving a content response 128, the content acquisitionmodule 180 determines the quality level of received content extractedfrom the content response 128. For example, the content acquisitionmodule 180 receives content quality information 204 from the contentquality module 192, where the content quality module 192 generates thequality level of the received content based on receiving a contentquality request from the content acquisition module 180 and where thecontent acquisition module 180 generates the content quality requestbased on content extracted from the content response 128. The contentquality information includes one or more of a content reliabilitythreshold range, a content accuracy threshold range, a desired contentquality level, a predicted content quality level, and a predicted levelof trust.

When the quality level is below a minimum desired quality thresholdlevel, the content acquisition module 180 facilitates acquisition offurther content. The facilitating includes issuing another contentrequest 126 to a same content source and/or to another content source toreceive and interpret further received content. When the quality levelis above the minimum desired quality threshold level, the contentacquisition module 180 issues a collections response 134 to therequester. The issuing includes processing the content in accordancewith a transformation approach to produce transformed content,generating the collections response 134 to include the transformedcontent, and sending the collections response 134 to the requester. Theprocessing of the content to produce the transformed content includesreceiving content transformation information 202 from the contenttransformation module 190, where the content transformation module 190transforms the content in accordance with the transformation approach toproduce the transformed content. The content transformation informationincludes a desired format, available formats, recommended formatting,the received content, transformation instructions, and the transformedcontent.

FIG. 5B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for obtainingcontent within a computing system. In particular, a method is presentedfor use in conjunction with one or more functions and features describedin conjunction with FIGS. 1-3, 4A-4C, 5A, and also FIG. 5B. The methodincludes step 210 where a processing module of one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices of the computing systemreceives a collections request from the requester. The method continuesat step 212 where the processing module determines content selectioninformation. The determining includes interpreting the collectionsrequest to identify requirements of the content.

The method continues at step 214 where the processing module determinessource selection information. The determining includes interpreting thecollections request to identify and select one or more sources for thecontent to be collected. The method continues at step 216 where theprocessing module determines acquisition timing information. Thedetermining includes interpreting the collections request to identifytiming requirements for the acquisition of the content from the one ormore sources. The method continues at step 218 where the processingmodule issues a content request utilizing security information and inaccordance with one or more of the content selection information, thesource selection information, and the acquisition timing information.For example, the processing module issues the content request to the oneor more sources for the content in accordance with the contentrequirements, where the sending of the request is in accordance with theacquisition timing information.

The method continues at step 220 where the processing module determinesa content quality level for received content area the determiningincludes receiving the content from the one or more sources, obtainingcontent quality information for the received content based on a qualityanalysis of the received content. The method branches to step 224 whenthe content quality level is favorable and the method continues to step222 when the quality level is unfavorable. For example, the processingmodule determines that the content quality level is favorable when thecontent quality level is equal to or above a minimum quality thresholdlevel and determines that the content quality level is unfavorable whenthe content quality level is less than the minimum quality thresholdlevel.

When the content quality level is unfavorable, the method continues atstep 222 where the processing module facilitates acquisition and furthercontent. For example, the processing module issues further contentrequests and receives further content for analysis. When the contentquality level is favorable, the method continues at step 224 where theprocessing module issues a collections response to the requester. Theissuing includes generating the collections response and sending thecollections response to the requester. The generating of the collectionsresponse may include transforming the received content into transformedcontent in accordance with a transformation approach (e.g.,reformatting, interpreting absolute meaning and translating into anotherlanguage in accordance with the absolute meaning, etc.).

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 5C is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the querymodule 124 of FIG. 4A that includes an answer acquisition module 230, acontent requirements module 232 a source requirements module 234, acontent security module 236, an answer timing module 238, an answertransformation module 240, and an answer quality module 242. Generally,an embodiment of this invention presents solutions where the querymodule 124 supports responding to a query.

In an example of operation of the responding to the query, the answeracquisition module 230 receives a query request 136 from a requester.The answer acquisition module 230 obtains content requirementsinformation 248 based on the query request 136. The content requirementsinformation 248 includes one or more of content parameters, a desiredcontent type, a desired content source if any, a content type if any,candidate source identifiers, a content profile, and a question of thequery request 136. For example, the answer acquisition module 230receives the content requirements information 248 from the contentrequirements module 232, where the content requirements module 232generates the content requirements information 248 based on a contentrequirements information request from the answer acquisition module 230and where the answer acquisition module 230 generates the contentrequirements information request based on the query request 136.

The answer acquisition module 230 obtains source requirementsinformation 250 based on the query request 136. The source requirementsinformation 250 includes one or more of candidate source identifiers, acontent profile, a desired source parameter, recommended sourceparameters, source priority levels, and recommended source accesstiming. For example, the answer acquisition module 230 receives thesource requirements information 250 from the source requirements module234, where the source requirements module 234 generates the sourcerequirements information 250 based on a source requirements informationrequest from the answer acquisition module 230 and where the answeracquisition module 230 generates the source requirements informationrequest based on the query request 136.

The answer acquisition module 230 obtains answer timing information 254based on the query request 136. The answer timing information 254includes one or more of requested answer timing, confirmed answertiming, source access testing results, estimated velocity of contentupdates, content freshness, timestamps, predicted time available,requested content acquisition trigger, and a content acquisition triggerdetected indicator. For example, the answer acquisition module 230receives the answer timing information 254 from the answer timing module238, where the answer timing module 238 generates the answer timinginformation 254 based on an answer timing information request from theanswer acquisition module 230 and where the answer acquisition module230 generates the answer timing information request based on the queryrequest 136.

Having obtained the content requirements information 248, the sourcerequirements information 250, and the answer timing information 254, theanswer acquisition module 230 determines whether to issue an IEI request244 and/or a collections request 132 based on one or more of the contentrequirements information 248, the source requirements information 250,and the answer timing information 254. For example, the answeracquisition module 230 selects the IEI request 244 when an immediateanswer to a simple query request 136 is required and is expected to havea favorable quality level. As another example, the answer acquisitionmodule 230 selects the collections request 132 when a longer-term answeris required as indicated by the answer timing information to beforeand/or when the query request 136 has an unfavorable quality level.

When issuing the IEI request 244, the answer acquisition module 230generates the IEI request 244 in accordance with security information252 received from the content security module 236 and based on one ormore of the content requirements information 248, the sourcerequirements information 250, and the answer timing information 254.Having generated the IEI request 244, the answer acquisition module 230sends the IEI request 244 to at least one IEI module.

When issuing the collections request 132, the answer acquisition module230 generates the collections request 132 in accordance with thesecurity information 252 received from the content security module 236and based on one or more of the content requirements information 248,the source requirements information 250, and the answer timinginformation 254. Having generated the collections request 132, theanswer acquisition module 230 sends the collections request 132 to atleast one collections module. Alternatively, the answer acquisitionmodule 230 facilitate sending of the collections request 132 to one ormore various user devices (e.g., to access a subject matter expert).

The answer acquisition module 230 determines a quality level of areceived answer extracted from a collections response 134 and/or an IEIresponse 246. For example, the answer acquisition module 230 extractsthe quality level of the received answer from answer quality information258 received from the answer quality module 242 in response to an answerquality request from the answer acquisition module 230. When the qualitylevel is unfavorable, the answer acquisition module 230 facilitatesobtaining a further answer. The facilitation includes issuing at leastone of a further IEI request 244 and a further collections request 132to generate a further answer for further quality testing. When thequality level is favorable, the answer acquisition module 230 issues aquery response 140 to the requester. The issuing includes generating thequery response 140 based on answer transformation information 256received from the answer transformation module 240, where the answertransformation module 240 generates the answer transformationinformation 256 to include a transformed answer based on receiving theanswer from the answer acquisition module 230. The answer transformationinformation 250 6A further include the question, a desired format of theanswer, available formats, recommended formatting, received LEIresponses, transformation instructions, and transformed LEI responsesinto an answer.

FIG. 5D is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for providing aresponse to a query within a computing system. In particular, a methodis presented for use in conjunction with one or more functions andfeatures described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-3, 4A-4C, 5C, and alsoFIG. 5D. The method includes step 270 where a processing module of oneor more processing modules of one or more computing devices of thecomputing system receives a query request (e.g., a question) from arequester. The method continues at step 272 where the processing moduledetermines content requirements information. The determining includesinterpreting the query request to produce the content requirements. Themethod continues at step 274 where the processing module determinessource requirements information. The determining includes interpretingthe query request to produce the source requirements. The methodcontinues at step 276 where the processing module determines answertiming information. The determining includes interpreting the queryrequest to produce the answer timing information.

The method continues at step 278 the processing module determineswhether to issue an LEI request and/or a collections request. Forexample, the determining includes selecting the LEI request when theanswer timing information indicates that a simple one-time answer isappropriate. As another example, the processing module selects thecollections request when the answer timing information indicates thatthe answer is associated with a series of events over an event timeframe.

When issuing the LEI request, the method continues at step 280 where theprocessing module issues the LEI request to an LEI module. The issuingincludes generating the IEI request in accordance with securityinformation and based on one or more of the content requirementsinformation, the source requirements information, and the answer timinginformation.

When issuing the collections request, the method continues at step 282where the processing module issues the collections request to acollections module. The issuing includes generating the collectionsrequest in accordance with the security information and based on one ormore of the content requirements information, the source requirementsinformation, and the answer timing information. Alternatively, theprocessing module issues both the LEI request and the collectionsrequest when a satisfactory partial answer may be provided based on acorresponding LEI response and a further more generalized and specificanswer may be provided based on a corresponding collections response andassociated further LEI response.

The method continues at step 284 where the processing module determinesa quality level of a received answer. The determining includesextracting the answer from the collections response and/or the LEIresponse and interpreting the answer in accordance with one or more ofthe content requirements information, the source requirementsinformation, the answer timing information, and the query request toproduce the quality level. The method branches to step 288 when thequality level is favorable and the method continues to step 286 when thequality level is unfavorable. For example, the processing moduleindicates that the quality level is favorable when the quality level isequal to or greater than a minimum answer quality threshold level. Asanother example, the processing module indicates that the quality levelis unfavorable when the quality level is less than the minimum answerquality threshold level.

When the quality level is unfavorable, the method continues at step 286where the processing module obtains a further answer. The obtainingincludes at least one of issuing a further LEI request and a furthercollections request to facilitate obtaining of a further answer forfurther answer quality level testing as the method loops back to step270. When the quality level is favorable, the method continues at step288 where the processing module issues a query response to therequester. The issuing includes transforming the answer into atransformed answer in accordance with an answer transformation approach(e.g., formatting, further interpretations of the virtual question inlight of the answer and further knowledge) and sending the transformedanswer to the requester as the query response.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 5E is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the identigenentigen intelligence (WI) module 122 of FIG. 4A that includes a contentingestion module 300, an element identification module 302, andinterpretation module 304, and answer resolution module 306, and an IEIcontrol module 308. Generally, an embodiment of this invention presentssolutions where the IEI module 122 supports interpreting content toproduce knowledge that may be utilized to answer questions.

In an example of operation of the producing and utilizing of theknowledge, the content ingestion module 300 generates formatted content314 based on question content 312 and/or source content 310, where theIEI module 122 receives an IEI request 244 that includes the questioncontent 312 and the IEI module 122 receives a collections response 134that includes the source content 310. The source content 310 includescontent from a source extracted from the collections response 134. Thequestion content 312 includes content extracted from the IEI request 244(e.g., content paired with a question). The content ingestion module 300generates the formatted content 314 in accordance with a formattingapproach (e.g., creating proper sentences from words of the content).The formatted content 314 includes modified content that is compatiblewith subsequent element identification (e.g., complete sentences,combinations of words and interpreted sounds and/or inflection cues withtemporal associations of words).

The element identification module 302 processes the formatted content314 based on element rules 318 and an element list 332 to produceidentified element information 340. Rules 316 includes the element rules318 (e.g., match, partial match, language translation, etc.). Lists 330includes the element list 332 (e.g., element ID, element context ID,element usage ID, words, characters, symbols etc.). The IEI controlmodule 308 may provide the rules 316 and the lists 330 by accessingstored data 360 from a memory associated with the IEI module 122.Generally, an embodiment of this invention presents solutions where thestored data 360 may further include one or more of a descriptivedictionary, categories, representations of element sets, element list,sequence data, pending questions, pending request, recognized elements,unrecognized elements, errors, etc.

The identified element information 340 includes one or more ofidentifiers of elements identified in the formatted content 314, mayinclude ordering and/or sequencing and grouping information. Forexample, the element identification module 302 compares elements of theformatted content 314 to known elements of the element list 332 toproduce identifiers of the known elements as the identified elementinformation 340 in accordance with the element rules 318. Alternatively,the element identification module 302 outputs un-identified elementinformation 342 to the IEI control module 308, where the un-identifiedelement information 342 includes temporary identifiers for elements notidentifiable from the formatted content 314 when compared to the elementlist 332.

The interpretation module 304 processes the identified elementinformation 340 in accordance with interpretation rules 320 (e.g.,potentially valid permutations of various combinations of identifiedelements), question information 346 (e.g., a question extracted from theLEI request to hundred 44 which may be paired with content associatedwith the question), and a groupings list 334 (e.g., representations ofassociated groups of representations of things, a set of elementidentifiers, valid element usage IDs in accordance with similar, anelement context, permutations of sets of identifiers for possibleinterpretations of a sentence or other) to produce interpretedinformation 344. The interpreted information 344 includes potentiallyvalid interpretations of combinations of identified elements. Generally,an embodiment of this invention presents solutions where theinterpretation module 304 supports producing the interpreted information344 by considering permutations of the identified element information340 in accordance with the interpretation rules 320 and the groupingslist 334.

The answer resolution module 306 processes the interpreted information344 based on answer rules 322 (e.g., guidance to extract a desiredanswer), the question information 346, and inferred question information352 (e.g., posed by the LEI control module or analysis of generalcollections of content or refinement of a stated question from arequest) to produce preliminary answers 354 and an answer quality level356. The answer generally lies in the interpreted information 344 asboth new content received and knowledge based on groupings list 334generated based on previously received content. The preliminary answers354 includes an answer to a stated or inferred question that subjectfurther refinement. The answer quality level 356 includes adetermination of a quality level of the preliminary answers 354 based onthe answer rules 322. The inferred question information 352 may furtherbe associated with time information 348, where the time informationincludes one or more of current real-time, a time reference associatedwith entity submitting a request, and a time reference of a collectionsresponse.

When the LEI control module 308 determines that the answer quality level356 is below an answer quality threshold level, the LEI control module308 facilitates collecting of further content (e.g., by issuing acollections request 132 and receiving corresponding collectionsresponses 134 for analysis). When the answer quality level 356 comparesfavorably to the answer quality threshold level, the LEI control module308 issues an LEI response 246 based on the preliminary answers 354.When receiving training information 358, the LEI control module 308facilitates updating of one or more of the lists 330 and the rules 316and stores the updated list 330 and the updated rules 316 in thememories as updated stored data 360.

FIG. 5F is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for analyzingcontent within a computing system. In particular, a method is presentedfor use in conjunction with one or more functions and features describedin conjunction with FIGS. 1-3, 4A-4C, 5E, and also FIG. 5F. The methodincludes step 370 where a processing module of one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices of the computing systemfacilitates updating of one or more rules and lists based on one or moreof received training information and received content. For example, theprocessing module updates rules with received rules to produce updatedrules and updates element lists with received elements to produceupdated element lists. As another example, the processing moduleinterprets the received content to identify a new word for at leasttemporary inclusion in the updated element list.

The method continues at step 372 where the processing module transformsat least some of the received content into formatted content. Forexample, the processing module processes the received content inaccordance with a transformation approach to produce the formattedcontent, where the formatted content supports compatibility withsubsequent element identification (e.g., typical sentence structures ofgroups of words).

The method continues at step 374 where the processing module processesthe formatted content based on the rules and the lists to produceidentified element information and/or an identified element information.For example, the processing module compares the formatted content toelement lists to identify a match producing identifiers for identifiedelements or new identifiers for unidentified elements when there is nomatch.

The method continues at step 376 with a processing module processes theidentified element information based on rules, the lists, and questioninformation to produce interpreted information. For example, theprocessing module compares the identified element information toassociated groups of representations of things to generate potentiallyvalid interpretations of combinations of identified elements.

The method continues at step 378 where the processing module processesthe interpreted information based on the rules, the questioninformation, and inferred question information to produce preliminaryanswers. For example, the processing module matches the interpretedinformation to one or more answers (e.g., embedded knowledge based on afact base built from previously received content) with highestcorrectness likelihood levels that is subject to further refinement.

The method continues at step 380 where the processing module generatesan answer quality level based on the preliminary answers, the rules, andthe inferred question information. For example, the processing modulepredicts the answer correctness likelihood level based on the rules, theinferred question information, and the question information. The methodbranches to step 384 when the answer quality level is favorable and themethod continues to step 382 when the answer quality level isunfavorable. For example, the generating of the answer quality levelfurther includes the processing module indicating that the answerquality level is favorable when the answer quality level is greater thanor equal to a minimum answer quality threshold level. As anotherexample, the generating of the answer quality level further includes theprocessing module indicating that the answer quality level isunfavorable when the answer quality level is less than the minimumanswer quality threshold level.

When the answer quality level is unfavorable, the method continues atstep 382 where the processing module facilitates gathering clarifyinginformation. For example, the processing module issues a collectionsrequest to facilitate receiving further content and or request questionclarification from a question requester. When the answer quality levelis favorable, the method continues at step 384 where the processingmodule issues a response that includes one or more answers based on thepreliminary answers and/or further updated preliminary answers based ongathering further content. For example, the processing module generatesa response that includes one or more answers and the answer qualitylevel and issues the response to the requester.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 6A is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the elementidentification module 302 of FIG. 5A and the interpretation module 304of FIG. 5A. The element identification module 302 includes an elementmatching module 400 and an element grouping module 402. Theinterpretation module 304 includes a grouping matching module 404 and agrouping interpretation module 406. Generally, an embodiment of thisinvention presents solutions where the element identification module 302supports identifying potentially valid permutations of groupings ofelements while the interpretation module 304 interprets the potentiallyvalid permutations of groupings of elements to produce interpretedinformation that includes the most likely of groupings based on aquestion.

In an example of operation of the identifying of the potentially validpermutations of groupings of elements, when matching elements of theformatted content 314, the element matching module 400 generates matchedelements 412 (e.g., identifiers of elements contained in the formattedcontent 314) based on the element list 332. For example, the elementmatching module 400 matches a received element to an element of theelement list 332 and outputs the matched elements 412 to include anidentifier of the matched element. When finding elements that areunidentified, the element matching module 400 outputs un-recognizedwords information 408 (e.g., words not in the element list 332, maytemporarily add) as part of un-identified element information 342. Forexample, the element matching module 400 indicates that a match cannotbe made between a received element of the formatted content 314,generates the unrecognized words info 408 to include the receivedelement and/or a temporary identifier, and issues and updated elementlist 414 that includes the temporary identifier and the correspondingunidentified received element.

The element grouping module 402 analyzes the matched elements 412 inaccordance with element rules 318 to produce grouping error information410 (e.g., incorrect sentence structure indicators) when a structuralerror is detected. The element grouping module 402 produces identifiedelement information 340 when favorable structure is associated with thematched elements in accordance with the element rules 318. Theidentified element information 340 may further include groupinginformation of the plurality of permutations of groups of elements(e.g., several possible interpretations), where the grouping informationincludes one or more groups of words forming an associated set and/orsuper-group set of two or more subsets when subsets share a common coreelement.

In an example of operation of the interpreting of the potentially validpermutations of groupings of elements to produce the interpretedinformation, the grouping matching module 404 analyzes the identifiedelement information 340 in accordance with a groupings list 334 toproduce validated groupings information 416. For example, the groupingmatching module 404 compares a grouping aspect of the identified elementinformation 340 (e.g., for each permutation of groups of elements ofpossible interpretations), generates the validated groupings information416 to include identification of valid permutations aligned with thegroupings list 334. Alternatively, or in addition to, the groupingmatching module 404 generates an updated groupings list 418 whendetermining a new valid grouping (e.g., has favorable structure andinterpreted meaning) that is to be added to the groupings list 334.

The grouping interpretation module 406 interprets the validatedgroupings information 416 based on the question information 346 and inaccordance with the interpretation rules 320 to produce interpretedinformation 344 (e.g., most likely interpretations, next most likelyinterpretations, etc.). For example, the grouping interpretation module406 obtains context, obtains favorable historical interpretations,processes the validated groupings based on interpretation rules 320,where each interpretation is associated with a correctness likelihoodlevel.

FIG. 6B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for interpretinginformation within a computing system. In particular, a method ispresented for use in conjunction with one or more functions and featuresdescribed in conjunction with FIGS. 1-3, 4A-4C, 5E-5F, 6A, and also FIG.6B. The method includes step 430 where a processing module of one ormore processing modules of one or more computing devices of thecomputing system analyzes formatted content. For example, the processingmodule attempt to match a received element of the formatted content toone or more elements of an elements list. When there is no match, themethod branches to step 434 and when there is a match, the methodcontinues to step 432. When there is a match, the method continues atstep 432 where the processing module outputs matched elements (e.g., toinclude the matched element and/or an identifier of the matchedelement). When there is no match, the method continues at step 434 wherethe processing module outputs unrecognized words (e.g., elements and/ora temporary identifier for the unmatched element).

The method continues at step 436 where the processing module analyzesmatched elements. For example, the processing module attempt to match adetected structure of the matched elements (e.g., chained elements as ina received sequence) to favorable structures in accordance with elementrules. The method branches to step 440 when the analysis is unfavorableand the method continues to step 438 when the analysis is favorable.When the analysis is favorable matching a detected structure to thefavorable structure of the element rules, the method continues at step438 where the processing module outputs identified element information(e.g., an identifier of the favorable structure, identifiers of each ofthe detected elements). When the analysis is unfavorable matching adetected structure to the favorable structure of the element rules, themethod continues at step 440 where the processing module outputsgrouping error information (e.g., a representation of the incorrectstructure, identifiers of the elements of the incorrect structure, atemporary new identifier of the incorrect structure).

The method continues at step 442 where the processing module analyzesthe identified element information to produce validated groupingsinformation. For example, the processing module compares a groupingaspect of the identified element information and generates the validatedgroupings information to include identification of valid permutationsthat align with the groupings list. Alternatively, or in addition to,the processing module generates an updated groupings list whendetermining a new valid grouping.

The method continues at step 444 where the processing module interpretsthe validated groupings information to produce interpreted information.For example, the processing module obtains one or more of context andhistorical interpretations and processes the validated groupings basedon interpretation rules to generate the interpreted information, whereeach interpretation is associated with a correctness likelihood level(e.g., a quality level).

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 6C is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the answerresolution module 306 of FIG. 5A that includes an interim answer module460, and answer prioritization module 462, and a preliminary answerquality module 464. Generally, an embodiment of this invention presentssolutions where the answer resolution module 306 supports producing ananswer for interpreted information 344.

In an example of operation of the providing of the answer, the interimanswer module 460 analyzes the interpreted information 344 based onquestion information 346 and inferred question information 352 toproduce interim answers 466 (e.g., answers to stated and/or inferredquestions without regard to rules that is subject to furtherrefinement). The answer prioritization module 462 analyzes the interimanswers 466 based on answer rules 322 to produce preliminary answer 354.For example, the answer prioritization module 462 identifies allpossible answers from the interim answers 466 that conform to the answerrules 322.

The preliminary answer quality module 464 analyzes the preliminaryanswers 354 in accordance with the question information 346, theinferred question information 352, and the answer rules 322 to producean answer quality level 356. For example, for each of the preliminaryanswers 354, the preliminary answer quality module 464 may compare a fitof the preliminary answer 354 to a corresponding previous answer andquestion quality level, calculate the answer quality level 356 based ona level of conformance to the answer rules 322, calculate the answerquality level 356 based on alignment with the inferred questioninformation 352, and determine the answer quality level 356 based on aninterpreted correlation with the question information 346.

FIG. 6D is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for producing ananswer within a computing system. In particular, a method is presentedfor use in conjunction with one or more functions and features describedin conjunction with FIGS. 1-3, 4A-4C, 5E-5F, 6C, and also FIG. 6D. Themethod includes step 480 where a processing module of one or moreprocessing modules of one or more computing devices of the computingsystem analyzes received interpreted information based on questioninformation and inferred question information to produce one or moreinterim answers. For example, the processing module generates potentialanswers based on patterns consistent with previously produced knowledgeand likelihood of correctness.

The method continues at step 482 where the processing module analyzesthe one or more interim answers based on answer rules to producepreliminary answers. For example, the processing module identifies allpossible answers from the interim answers that conform to the answerrules. The method continues at step 484 where the processing moduleanalyzes the preliminary answers in accordance with the questioninformation, the inferred question information, and the answer rules toproduce an answer quality level. For example, for each of the elementaryanswers, the processing module may compare a fit of the preliminaryanswer to a corresponding previous answer-and-answer quality level,calculate the answer quality level based on performance to the answerrules, calculate answer quality level based on alignment with theinferred question information, and determine the answer quality levelbased on interpreted correlation with the question information.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 7A is an information flow diagram for interpreting informationwithin a computing system, where sets of entigens 504 are interpretedfrom sets of identigens 502 which are interpreted from sentences ofwords 500. Such identigen entigen intelligence (WI) processing of thewords (e.g., to LEI process) includes producing one or more of interimknowledge, a preliminary answer, and an answer quality level. Forexample, the LEI processing includes identifying permutations ofidentigens of a phrase of a sentence (e.g., interpreting humanexpressions to produce identigen groupings for each word of ingestedcontent), reducing the permutations of identigens (e.g., utilizing rulesto eliminate unfavorable permutations), mapping the reduced permutationsof identigens to at least one set of entigens (e.g., most likelyidentigens become the entigens) to produce the interim knowledge,processing the knowledge in accordance with a knowledge database (e.g.,comparing the set of entigens to the knowledge database) to produce apreliminary answer, and generating the answer quality level based on thepreliminary answer for a corresponding domain.

Human expressions are utilized to portray facts and fiction about thereal world. The real-world includes items, actions, and attributes. Thehuman expressions include textual words, textual symbols, images, andother sensorial information (e.g., sounds). It is known that many words,within a given language, can mean different things based on groupingsand orderings of the words. For example, the sentences of words 500 caninclude many different forms of sentences that mean vastly differentthings even when the words are very similar.

The present invention presents solutions where the computing system 10supports producing a computer-based representation of a truest meaningpossible of the human expressions given the way that multitudes of humanexpressions relate to these meanings. As a first step of the flowdiagram to transition from human representations of things to a mostprecise computer representation of the things, the computer identifiesthe words, phrases, sentences, etc. from the human expressions toproduce the sets of identigens 502. Each identigen includes anidentifier of their meaning and an identifier of an instance for eachpossible language, culture, etc. For example, the words car andautomobile share a common meaning identifier but have different instanceidentifiers since they are different words and are spelled differently.As another example, the word duck is associated both with a bird and anaction to elude even though they are spelled the same. In this examplethe bird duck has a different meaning than the elude duck and as sucheach has a different meaning identifier of the corresponding identigens.

As a second step of the flow diagram to transition from humanrepresentations of things to the most precise computer representation ofthe things, the computer extracts meaning from groupings of theidentified words, phrases, sentences, etc. to produce the sets ofentigens 504. Each entigen includes an identifier of a singleconceivable and perceivable thing in space and time (e.g., independentof language and other aspects of the human expressions). For example,the words car and automobile are different instances of the same meaningand point to a common shared entigen. As another example, the word duckfor the bird meaning has an associated unique entigen that is differentthan the entigen for the word duck for the elude meaning.

As a third step of the flow diagram to transition from human expressionsof things to the most precise computer representation of the things, thecomputer reasons facts from the extracted meanings. For example, thecomputer maintains a fact-based of the valid meanings from the validgroupings or sets of entigens so as to support subsequent inferences,deductions, rationalizations of posed questions to produce answers thatare aligned with a most factual view. As time goes on, and as an entigenhas been identified, it can encounter an experience transformations intime, space, attributes, actions, and words which are used to identifyit without creating contradictions or ever losing its identity.

FIG. 7B is a relationship block diagram illustrating an embodiment ofrelationships between things 510 and representations of things 512within a computing system. The things 510 includes conceivable andperceivable things including actions 522, items 524, and attributes 526.The representation of things 512 includes representations of things usedby humans 514 and representation of things used by of computing devices516 of embodiments of the present invention. The things 510 relates tothe representations of things used by humans 514 where the inventionpresents solutions where the computing system 10 supports mapping therepresentations of things used by humans 514 to the representations ofthings used by computing devices 516, where the representations ofthings used by computing devices 516 map back to the things 510.

The representations of things used by humans 514 includes textual words528, textual symbols 530, images (e.g., non-textual) 532, and othersensorial information 534 (e.g., sounds, sensor data, electrical fields,voice inflections, emotion representations, facial expressions,whistles, etc.). The representations of things used by computing devices516 includes identigens 518 and entigens 520. The representations ofthings used by humans 514 maps to the identigens 518 and the identigens518 map to the entigens 520. The entigens 520 uniquely maps back to thethings 510 in space and time, a truest meaning the computer is lookingfor to create knowledge and answer questions based on the knowledge.

To accommodate the mapping of the representations of things used byhumans 514 to the identigens 518, the identigens 518 is partitioned intoactenyms 544 (e.g., actions), itenyms 546 (e.g., items), attrenyms 548(e.g., attributes), and functionals 550 (e.g., that join and/ordescribe). Each of the actenyms 544, itenyms 546, and attrenyms 548 maybe further classified into singulatums 552 (e.g., identify one uniqueentigen) and pluratums 554 (e.g., identify a plurality of entigens thathave similarities).

Each identigen 518 is associated with an identigens identifier (IDN)536. The IDN 536 includes a meaning identifier (ID) 538 portion, aninstance ID 540 portion, and a type ID 542 portion. The meaning ID 538includes an identifier of common meaning. The instance ID 540 includesan identifier of a particular word and language. The type ID 542includes one or more identifiers for actenyms, itenyms, attrenyms,singulatums, pluratums, a time reference, and any other reference todescribe the IDN 536. The mapping of the representations of things usedby humans 514 to the identigens 518 by the computing system of thepresent invention includes determining the identigens 518 in accordancewith logic and instructions for forming groupings of words.

Generally, an embodiment of this invention presents solutions where theidentigens 518 map to the entigens 520. Multiple identigens may map to acommon unique entigen. The mapping of the identigens 518 to the entigens520 by the computing system of the present invention includesdetermining entigens in accordance with logic and instructions forforming groupings of identigens.

FIG. 7C is a diagram of an embodiment of a synonym words table 570within a computing system, where the synonym words table 570 includesmultiple fields including textual words 572, identigens 518, andentigens 520. The identigens 518 includes fields for the meaningidentifier (ID) 538 and the instance ID 540. The computing system of thepresent invention may utilize the synonym words table 570 to map textualwords 572 to identigens 518 and map the identigens 518 to entigens 520.For example, the words car, automobile, auto, bil (Swedish), carro(Spanish), and bil (Danish) all share a common meaning but are differentinstances (e.g., different words and languages). The words map to acommon meaning ID but to individual unique instant identifiers. Each ofthe different identigens map to a common entigen since they describe thesame thing.

FIG. 7D is a diagram of an embodiment of a polysemous words table 576within a computing system, where the polysemous words table 576 includesmultiple fields including textual words 572, identigens 518, andentigens 520. The identigens 518 includes fields for the meaningidentifier (ID) 538 and the instance ID 540. The computing system of thepresent invention may utilize the polysemous words table 576 to maptextual words 572 to identigens 518 and map the identigens 518 toentigens 520. For example, the word duck maps to four differentidentigens since the word duck has four associated different meanings(e.g., bird, fabric, to submerge, to elude) and instances. Each of theidentigens represent different things and hence map to four differententigens.

FIG. 7E is a diagram of an embodiment of transforming words intogroupings within a computing system that includes a words table 580, agroupings of words section to validate permutations of groupings, and agroupings table 584 to capture the valid groupings. The words table 580includes multiple fields including textual words 572, identigens 518,and entigens 520. The identigens 518 includes fields for the meaningidentifier (ID) 538, the instance ID 540, and the type ID 542. Thecomputing system of the present invention may utilize the words table580 to map textual words 572 to identigens 518 and map the identigens518 to entigens 520. For example, the word pilot may refer to a flyerand the action to fly. Each meaning has a different identigen anddifferent entigen.

The computing system the present invention may apply rules to the fieldsof the words table 580 to validate various groupings of words. Thosethat are invalid are denoted with a “X” while those that are valid areassociated with a check mark. For example, the grouping “pilot Tom” isinvalid when the word pilot refers to flying and Tom refers to a person.The identigen combinations for the flying pilot and the person Tom aredenoted as invalid by the rules. As another example, the grouping “pilotTom” is valid when the word pilot refers to a flyer and Tom refers tothe person. The identigen combinations for the flyer pilot and theperson Tom are denoted as valid by the rules.

The groupings table 584 includes multiple fields including grouping ID586, word strings 588, identigens 518, and entigens 520. The computingsystem of the present invention may produce the groupings table 584 as astored fact base for valid and/or invalid groupings of words identifiedby their corresponding identigens. For example, the valid grouping“pilot Tom” referring to flyer Tom the person is represented with agrouping identifier of 3001 and identity and identifiers 150.001 and457.001. The entigen field 520 may indicate associated entigens thatcorrespond to the identigens. For example, entigen e717 corresponds tothe flyer pilot meaning and entigen e61 corresponds to the time theperson meaning. Alternatively, or in addition to, the entigen field 520may be populated with a single entigen identifier (ENI).

The word strings field 588 may include any number of words in a string.Different ordering of the same words can produce multiple differentstrings and even different meanings and hence entigens. More broadly,each entry (e.g., role) of the groupings table 584 may refer togroupings of words, two or more word strings, an idiom, just identigens,just entigens, and/or any combination of the preceding elements. Eachentry has a unique grouping identifier. An idiom may have a uniquegrouping ID and include identifiers of original word identigens andreplacing identigens associated with the meaning of the idiom not justthe meaning of the original words. Valid groupings may still haveambiguity on their own and may need more strings and/or context toselect a best fit when interpreting a truest meaning of the grouping.

FIG. 8A is a data flow diagram for accumulating knowledge within acomputing system, where a computing device, at a time=t0, ingests andprocesses facts 598 at a step 590 based on rules 316 and fact baseinformation 600 to produce groupings 602 for storage in a fact base 592(e.g., words, phrases, word groupings, identigens, entigens, qualitylevels). The facts 598 may include information from books, archive data,Central intelligence agency (CIA) world fact book, trusted content, etc.The ingesting may include filtering to organize and promote better validgroupings detection (e.g., considering similar domains together). Thegroupings 602 includes one or more of groupings identifiers, identigenidentifiers, entigen identifiers, and estimated fit quality levels. Theprocessing step 590 may include identifying identigens from words of thefacts 598 in accordance with the rules 316 and the fact base info 600and identifying groupings utilizing identigens in accordance with rules316 and fact base info 600.

Subsequent to ingestion and processing of the facts 598 to establish thefact base 592, at a time=t1+, the computing device ingests and processesnew content 604 at a step 594 in accordance with the rules 316 and thefact base information 600 to produce preliminary grouping 606. The newcontent may include updated content (e.g., timewise) from periodicals,newsfeeds, social media, etc. The preliminary grouping 606 includes oneor more of preliminary groupings identifiers, preliminary identigenidentifiers, preliminary entigen identifiers, estimated fit qualitylevels, and representations of unidentified words.

The computing device validates the preliminary groupings 606 at a step596 based on the rules 316 and the fact base info 600 to produce updatedfact base info 608 for storage in the fact base 592. The validatingincludes one or more of reasoning a fit of existing fact base info 600with the new preliminary grouping 606, discarding preliminary groupings,updating just time frame information associated with an entry of theexisting fact base info 600 (e.g., to validate knowledge for thepresent), creating new entigens, and creating a median entigen tosummarize portions of knowledge within a median indicator as a qualitylevel indicator (e.g., suggestive not certain).

Storage of the updated fact base information 608 captures patterns thatdevelop by themselves instead of searching for patterns as in prior artartificial intelligence systems. Growth of the fact base 592 enablessubsequent reasoning to create new knowledge including deduction,induction, inference, and inferential sentiment (e.g., a chain ofsentiment sentences). Examples of sentiments includes emotion, beliefs,convictions, feelings, judgments, notions, opinions, and views.

FIG. 8B is a diagram of an embodiment of a groupings table 620 within acomputing system. The groupings table 620 includes multiple fieldsincluding grouping ID 586, word strings 588, an IF string 622 and a THENstring 624. Each of the fields for the IF string 622 and the THEN string624 includes fields for an identigen (IDN) string 626, and an entigen(ENI) string 628. The computing system of the present invention mayproduce the groupings table 620 as a stored fact base to enable IF THENbased inference to generate a new knowledge inference 630.

As a specific example, grouping 5493 points out the logic of IF someonehas a tumor, THEN someone is sick and the grouping 5494 points of thelogic that IF someone is sick, THEN someone is sad. As a result ofutilizing inference, the new knowledge inference 630 may producegrouping 5495 where IF someone has a tumor, THEN someone is possibly sad(e.g., or is sad).

FIG. 8C is a data flow diagram for answering questions utilizingaccumulated knowledge within a computing system, where a computingdevice ingests and processes question information 346 at a step 640based on rules 316 and fact base info 600 from a fact base 592 toproduce preliminary grouping 606. The ingesting and processing questionsstep 640 includes identifying identigens from words of a question inaccordance with the rules 316 and the fact base information 600 and mayalso include identifying groupings from the identified identigens inaccordance with the rules 316 and the fact base information 600.

The computing device validates the preliminary grouping 606 at a step596 based on the rules 316 and the fact base information 600 to produceidentified element information 340. For example, the computing devicereasons fit of existing fact base information with new preliminarygroupings 606 to produce the identified element information 340associated with highest quality levels. The computing device interpretsa question of the identified element information 340 at a step 642 basedon the rules 316 and the fact base information 600. The interpreting ofthe question may include separating new content from the question andreducing the question based on the fact base information 600 and the newcontent.

The computing device produces preliminary answers 354 from theinterpreted information 344 at a resolve answer step 644 based on therules 316 and the fact base information 600. For example, the computingdevice compares the interpreted information 344 two the fact baseinformation 600 to produce the preliminary answers 354 with highestquality levels utilizing one or more of deduction, induction,inferencing, and applying inferential sentiments logic. Alternatively,or in addition to, the computing device may save new knowledgeidentified from the question information 346 to update the fact base592.

FIG. 8D is a data flow diagram for answering questions utilizinginterference within a computing system that includes a groupings table648 and the resolve answer step 644 of FIG. 8C. The groupings table 648includes multiple fields including fields for a grouping (GRP)identifier (ID) 586, word strings 588, an identigen (IDN) string 626,and an entigen (ENI) 628. The groupings table 648 may be utilized tobuild a fact base to enable resolving a future question into an answer.For example, the grouping 8356 notes knowledge that Michael sleeps eighthours and grouping 8357 notes that Michael usually starts to sleep at 11PM.

In a first question example that includes a question “Michaelsleeping?”, the resolve answer step 644 analyzes the question from theinterpreted information 344 in accordance with the fact base information600, the rules 316, and a real-time indicator that the current time is 1AM to produce a preliminary answer of “possibly YES” when inferring thatMichael is probably sleeping at 1 AM when Michael usually startssleeping at 11 PM and Michael usually sleeps for a duration of eighthours.

In a second question example that includes the question “Michaelsleeping?”, the resolve answer step 644 analyzes the question from theinterpreted information 344 in accordance with the fact base information600, the rules 316, and a real-time indicator that the current time isnow 11 AM to produce a preliminary answer of “possibly NO” wheninferring that Michael is probably not sleeping at 11 AM when Michaelusually starts sleeping at 11 PM and Michael usually sleeps for aduration of eight hours.

FIG. 8E is a relationship block diagram illustrating another embodimentof relationships between things and representations of things within acomputing system. While things in the real world are described withwords, it is often the case that a particular word has multiple meaningsin isolation. Interpreting the meaning of the particular word may hingeon analyzing how the word is utilized in a phrase, a sentence, multiplesentences, paragraphs, and even whole documents or more. Describing andstratifying the use of words, word types, and possible meanings help ininterpreting a true meaning.

Humans utilize textual words 528 to represent things in the real world.Quite often a particular word has multiple instances of differentgrammatical use when part of a phrase of one or more sentences. Thegrammatical use 649 of words includes the nouns and the verbs, and alsoincludes adverbs, adjectives, pronouns, conjunctions, prepositions,determiners, exclamations, etc.

As an example of multiple grammatical use, the word “bat” in the Englishlanguage can be utilized as a noun or a verb. For instance, whenutilized as a noun, the word “bat” may apply to a baseball bat or mayapply to a flying “bat.” As another instance, when utilized as a verb,the word “bat” may apply to the action of hitting or batting an object,i.e., “bat the ball.”

To stratify word types by use, the words are associated with a word type(e.g., type identifier 542). The word types include objects (e.g., items524), characteristics (e.g., attributes 526), actions 522, and thefunctionals 550 for joining other words and describing words. Forexample, when the word “bat” is utilized as a noun, the word isdescribing the object of either the baseball bat or the flying bat. Asanother example, when the word “bat” is utilized as a verb, the word isdescribing the action of hitting.

To determine possible meanings, the words, by word type, are mapped toassociative meanings (e.g., identigens 518). For each possibleassociative meaning, the word type is documented with the meaning andfurther with an identifier (ID) of the instance (e.g., an identigenidentifier).

For the example of the word “bat” when utilized as a noun for thebaseball bat, a first identigen identifier 536-1 includes a type ID542-1 associated with the object 524, an instance ID 540-1 associatedwith the first identigen identifier (e.g., unique for the baseball bat),and a meaning ID 538-1 associated with the baseball bat. For the exampleof the word “bat” when utilized as a noun for the flying bat, a secondidentigen identifier 536-2 includes a type ID 542-1 associated with theobject 524, an instance ID 540-2 associated with the second identigenidentifier (e.g., unique for the flying bat), and a meaning ID 538-2associated with the flying bat. For the example of the word “bat” whenutilized as a verb for the bat that hits, a third identigen identifier536-2 includes a type ID 542-2 associated with the actions 522, aninstance ID 540-3 associated with the third identigen identifier (e.g.,unique for the bat that hits), and a meaning ID 538-3 associated withthe bat that hits.

With the word described by a type and possible associative meanings, acombination of full grammatical use of the word within the phrase etc.,application of rules, and utilization of an ever-growing knowledgedatabase that represents knowledge by linked entigens, the absolutemeaning (e.g., entigen 520) of the word is represented as a uniqueentigen. For example, a first entigen e1 represents the absolute meaningof a baseball bat (e.g., a generic baseball bat not a particularbaseball bat that belongs to anyone), a second entigen e2 represents theabsolute meaning of the flying bat (e.g., a generic flying bat not aparticular flying bat), and a third entigen e3 represents the absolutemeaning of the verb bat (e.g., to hit).

An embodiment of methods to ingest text to produce absolute meanings forstorage in a knowledge database are discussed in greater detail withreference to FIGS. 8F-H. Those embodiments further discuss thediscerning of the grammatical use, the use of the rules, and theutilization of the knowledge database to definitively interpret theabsolute meaning of a string of words.

Another embodiment of methods to respond to a query to produce an answerbased on knowledge stored in the knowledge database are discussed ingreater detail with reference to FIGS. 8J-L. Those embodiments furtherdiscuss the discerning of the grammatical use, the use of the rules, andthe utilization of the knowledge database to interpret the query. Thequery interpretation is utilized to extract the answer from theknowledge database to facilitate forming the query response.

FIGS. 8F and 8G are schematic block diagrams of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes the content ingestion module 300 of FIG.5E, the element identification module 302 of FIG. 5E, the interpretationmodule 304 of FIG. 5E, the LEI control module 308 of FIG. 5E, and the SSmemory 96 of FIG. 2 . Generally, an embodiment of this inventionprovides presents solutions where the computing system 10 supportsprocessing content to produce knowledge for storage in a knowledgedatabase.

The processing of the content to produce the knowledge includes a seriesof steps. For example, a first step includes identifying words of aningested phrase to produce tokenized words. As depicted in FIG. 8F, aspecific example of the first step includes the content ingestion module300 comparing words of source content 310 to dictionary entries toproduce formatted content 314 that includes identifiers of known words.Alternatively, when a comparison is unfavorable, the temporaryidentifier may be assigned to an unknown word. For instance, the contentingestion module 300 produces identifiers associated with the words“the”, “black”, “bat”, “eats”, and “fruit” when the ingested phraseincludes “The black bat eats fruit”, and generates the formatted content314 to include the identifiers of the words.

A second step of the processing of the content to produce the knowledgeincludes, for each tokenized word, identifying one or more identigensthat correspond the tokenized word, where each identigen describes oneof an object, a characteristic, and an action. As depicted in FIG. 8F, aspecific example of the second step includes the element identificationmodule 302 performing a look up of identigen identifiers, utilizing anelement list 332 and in accordance with element rules 318, of the one ormore identigens associated with each tokenized word of the formattedcontent 314 to produce identified element information 340.

A unique identifier is associated with each of the potential object, thecharacteristic, and the action (OCA) associated with the tokenized word(e.g. sequential identigens). For instance, the element identificationmodule 302 identifies a functional symbol for “the”, identifies a singleidentigen for “black”, identifies two identigens for “bat” (e.g.,baseball bat and flying bat), identifies a single identigen for “eats”,and identifies a single identigen for “fruit.” When at least onetokenized word is associated with multiple identigens, two or morepermutations of sequential combinations of identigens for each tokenizedword result. For example, when “bat” is associated with two identigens,two permutations of sequential combinations of identigens result for theingested phrase.

A third step of the processing of the content to produce the knowledgeincludes, for each permutation of sequential combinations of identigens,generating a corresponding equation package (i.e., candidateinterpretation), where the equation package includes a sequentiallinking of pairs of identigens (e.g., relationships), where eachsequential linking pairs a preceding identigen to a next identigen, andwhere an equation element describes a relationship between pairedidentigens (OCAs) such as describes, acts on, is a, belongs to, did, didto, etc. Multiple OCAs occur for a common word when the word hasmultiple potential meanings (e.g., a baseball bat, a flying bat).

As depicted in FIG. 8F, a specific example of the third step includesthe interpretation module 304, for each permutation of identigens ofeach tokenized word of the identified element information 340, theinterpretation module 304 generates, in accordance with interpretationrules 320 and a groupings list 334, an equation package to include oneor more of the identifiers of the tokenized words, a list of identifiersof the identigens of the equation package, a list of pairing identifiersfor sequential pairs of identigens, and a quality metric associated witheach sequential pair of identigens (e.g., likelihood of a properinterpretation). For instance, the interpretation module 304 produces afirst equation package that includes a first identigen pairing of ablack bat (e.g., flying bat with a higher quality metric level), thesecond pairing of bat eats (e.g., the flying bat eats, with a higherquality metric level), and a third pairing of eats fruit, and theinterpretation module 304 produces a second equation package thatincludes a first pairing of a black bat (e.g., baseball bat, with aneutral quality metric level), the second pairing of bat eats (e.g., thebaseball bat eats, with a lower quality metric level), and a thirdpairing of eats fruit.

A fourth step of the processing of the content to produce the knowledgeincludes selecting a surviving equation package associated with a mostfavorable confidence level. As depicted in FIG. 8F, a specific exampleof the fourth step includes the interpretation module 304 applyinginterpretation rules 320 (i.e., inference, pragmatic engine, utilizingthe identifiers of the identigens to match against known validcombinations of identifiers of entigens) to reduce a number ofpermutations of the sequential combinations of identigens to produceinterpreted information 344 that includes identification of at least oneequation package as a surviving interpretation SI (e.g., higher qualitymetric level).

Non-surviving equation packages are eliminated that compare unfavorablyto pairing rules and/or are associated with an unfavorable qualitymetric levels to produce a non-surviving interpretation NSI 2 (e.g.,lower quality metric level), where an overall quality metric level maybe assigned to each equation package based on quality metric levels ofeach pairing, such that a higher quality metric level of an equationpackage indicates a higher probability of a most favorableinterpretation. For instance, the interpretation module 304 eliminatesthe equation package that includes the second pairing indicating thatthe “baseball bat eats” which is inconsistent with a desired qualitymetric level of one or more of the groupings list 334 and theinterpretation rules 320 and selects the equation package associatedwith the “flying bat eats” which is favorably consistent with the one ormore of the quality metric levels of the groupings list 334 and theinterpretation rules 320.

A fifth step of the processing of the content to produce the knowledgeutilizing the confidence level includes integrating knowledge of thesurviving equation package into a knowledge database. For example,integrating at least a portion of the reduced OCA combinations into agraphical database to produce updated knowledge. As another example, theportion of the reduced OCA combinations may be translated into rows andcolumns entries when utilizing a rows and columns database rather than agraphical database. When utilizing the rows and columns approach for theknowledge database, subsequent access to the knowledge database mayutilize structured query language (SQL) queries.

As depicted in FIG. 8G, a specific example of the fifth step includesthe LEI control module 308 recovering fact base information 600 from SSmemory 96 to identify a portion of the knowledge database for potentialmodification utilizing the OCAs of the surviving interpretation SI 1(i.e., compare a pattern of relationships between the OCAs of thesurviving interpretation SI 1 from the interpreted information 344 torelationships of OCAs of the portion of the knowledge database includingpotentially new quality metric levels).

The fifth step further includes determining modifications (e.g.,additions, subtractions, further clarifications required wheninformation is complex, etc.) to the portion of the knowledge databasebased on the new quality metric levels. For instance, the IEI controlmodule 308 causes adding the element “black” as a “describes”relationship of an existing bat OCA and adding the element “fruit” as aneats “does to” relationship to implement the modifications to theportion of the fact base information 600 to produce updated fact baseinformation 608 for storage in the SS memory 96.

FIG. 8H is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for processingcontent to produce knowledge for storage within a computing system. Inparticular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one ormore functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8E,8F, and also FIG. 8G. The method includes step 650 where a processingmodule of one or more processing modules of one or more computingdevices of the computing system identifies words of an ingested phraseto produce tokenized words. The identified includes comparing words toknown words of dictionary entries to produce identifiers of known words.

For each tokenized word, the method continues at step 651 where theprocessing module identifies one or more identigens that corresponds tothe tokenized word, where each identigen describes one of an object, acharacteristic, and an action (e.g., OCA). The identifying includesperforming a lookup of identifiers of the one or more identigensassociated with each tokenized word, where he different identifiersassociated with each of the potential object, the characteristic, andthe action associated with the tokenized word.

The method continues at step 652 where the processing module, for eachpermutation of sequential combinations of identigens, generates aplurality of equation elements to form a corresponding equation package,where each equation element describes a relationship betweensequentially linked pairs of identigens, where each sequential linkingpairs a preceding identigen to a next identigen. For example, for eachpermutation of identigens of each tokenized word, the processing modulegenerates the equation package to include a plurality of equationelements, where each equation element describes the relationship (e.g.,describes, acts on, is a, belongs to, did, did too, etc.) betweensequentially adjacent identigens of a plurality of sequentialcombinations of identigens. Each equation element may be furtherassociated with a quality metric to evaluate a favorability level of aninterpretation in light of the sequence of identigens of the equationpackage.

The method continues at step 653 where the processing module selects asurviving equation package associated with most favorableinterpretation. For example, the processing module applies rules (i.e.,inference, pragmatic engine, utilizing the identifiers of the identigensto match against known valid combinations of identifiers of entigens),to reduce the number of permutations of the sequential combinations ofidentigens to identify at least one equation package, wherenon-surviving equation packages are eliminated the compare unfavorablyto pairing rules and/or are associated with an unfavorable qualitymetric levels to produce a non-surviving interpretation, where anoverall quality metric level is assigned to each equation package basedon quality metric levels of each pairing, such that a higher qualitymetric level indicates an equation package with a higher probability offavorability of correctness.

The method continues at step 654 where the processing module integratesknowledge of the surviving equation package into a knowledge database.For example, the processing module integrates at least a portion of thereduced OCA combinations into a graphical database to produce updatedknowledge. The integrating may include recovering fact base informationfrom storage of the knowledge database to identify a portion of theknowledge database for potential modifications utilizing the OCAs of thesurviving equation package (i.e., compare a pattern of relationshipsbetween the OCAs of the surviving equation package to relationships ofthe OCAs of the portion of the knowledge database including potentiallynew quality metric levels). The integrating further includes determiningmodifications (e.g., additions, subtractions, further clarificationsrequired when complex information is presented, etc.) to produce theupdated knowledge database that is based on fit of acceptable qualitymetric levels, and implementing the modifications to the portion of thefact base information to produce the updated fact base information forstorage in the portion of the knowledge database.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIGS. 8J and 8K are schematic block diagrams of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes the content ingestion module 300 of FIG.5E, the element identification module 302 of FIG. 5E, the interpretationmodule 304 of FIG. 5E, the answer resolution module 306 of FIG. 5E, andthe SS memory 96 of FIG. 2 . Generally, an embodiment of this inventionprovides solutions where the computing system 10 supports for generatinga query response to a query utilizing a knowledge database.

The generating of the query response to the query includes a series ofsteps. For example, a first step includes identifying words of aningested query to produce tokenized words. As depicted in FIG. 8J, aspecific example of the first step includes the content ingestion module300 comparing words of query info 138 to dictionary entries to produceformatted content 314 that includes identifiers of known words. Forinstance, the content ingestion module 300 produces identifiers for eachword of the query “what black animal flies and eats fruit and insects?”

A second step of the generating of the query response to the queryincludes, for each tokenized word, identifying one or more identigensthat correspond the tokenized word, where each identigen describes oneof an object, a characteristic, and an action (OCA). As depicted in FIG.8J, a specific example of the second step includes the elementidentification module 302 performing a look up of identifiers, utilizingan element list 332 and in accordance with element rules 318, of the oneor more identigens associated with each tokenized word of the formattedcontent 314 to produce identified element information 340. A uniqueidentifier is associated with each of the potential object, thecharacteristic, and the action associated with a particular tokenizedword. For instance, the element identification module 302 produces asingle identigen identifier for each of the black color, an animal,flies, eats, fruit, and insects.

A third step of the generating of the query response to the queryincludes, for each permutation of sequential combinations of identigens,generating a corresponding equation package (i.e., candidateinterpretation). The equation package includes a sequential linking ofpairs of identigens, where each sequential linking pairs a precedingidentigen to a next identigen. An equation element describes arelationship between paired identigens (OCAs) such as describes, actson, is a, belongs to, did, did to, etc.

As depicted in FIG. 8J, a specific example of the third step includesthe interpretation module 304, for each permutation of identigens ofeach tokenized word of the identified element information 340,generating the equation packages in accordance with interpretation rules320 and a groupings list 334 to produce a series of equation elementsthat include pairings of identigens. For instance, the interpretationmodule 304 generates a first pairing to describe a black animal, asecond pairing to describe an animal that flies, a third pairing todescribe flies and eats, a fourth pairing to describe eats fruit, and afifth pairing to describe eats fruit and insects.

A fourth step of the generating the query response to the query includesselecting a surviving equation package associated with a most favorableinterpretation. As depicted in FIG. 8J, a specific example of the fourthstep includes the interpretation module 304 applying the interpretationrules 320 (i.e., inference, pragmatic engine, utilizing the identifiersof the identigens to match against known valid combinations ofidentifiers of entigens) to reduce the number of permutations of thesequential combinations of identigens to produce interpreted information344. The interpreted information 344 includes identification of at leastone equation package as a surviving interpretation SI 10, wherenon-surviving equation packages, if any, are eliminated that compareunfavorably to pairing rules to produce a non-surviving interpretation.

A fifth step of the generating the query response to the query includesutilizing a knowledge database, generating a query response to thesurviving equation package of the query, where the surviving equationpackage of the query is transformed to produce query knowledge forcomparison to a portion of the knowledge database. An answer isextracted from the portion of the knowledge database to produce thequery response.

As depicted in FIG. 8K, a specific example of the fifth step includesthe answer resolution module 306 interpreting the survivinginterpretation SI 10 of the interpreted information 344 in accordancewith answer rules 322 to produce query knowledge QK 10 (i.e., agraphical representation of knowledge when the knowledge databaseutilizes a graphical database). For example, the answer resolutionmodule 306 accesses fact base information 600 from the SS memory 96 toidentify the portion of the knowledge database associated with afavorable comparison of the query knowledge QK 10 (e.g., by comparingattributes of the query knowledge QK 10 to attributes of the fact baseinformation 600), and generates preliminary answers 354 that includesthe answer to the query. For instance, the answer is “bat” when theassociated OCAs of bat, such as black, eats fruit, eats insects, is ananimal, and flies, aligns with OCAs of the query knowledge.

FIG. 8L is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for generating aquery response to a query utilizing knowledge within a knowledgedatabase within a computing system. In particular, a method is presentedfor use in conjunction with one or more functions and features describedin conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D, 8J, and also FIG. 8K. The methodincludes step 655 where a processing module of one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices of the computing systemidentifies words of an ingested query to produce tokenized words. Forexample, the processing module compares words to known words ofdictionary entries to produce identifiers of known words.

For each tokenized word, the method continues at step 656 where theprocessing module identifies one or more identigens that correspond tothe tokenized word, where each identigen describes one of an object, acharacteristic, and an action. For example, the processing moduleperforms a lookup of identifiers of the one or more identigensassociated with each tokenized word, where different identifiersassociated with each permutation of a potential object, characteristic,and action associated with the tokenized word.

For each permutation of sequential combinations of identigens, themethod continues at step 657 where the processing module generates aplurality of equation elements to form a corresponding equation package,where each equation element describes a relationship betweensequentially linked pairs of identigens. Each sequential linking pairs apreceding identigen to a next identigen. For example, for eachpermutation of identigens of each tokenized word, the processing moduleincludes all other permutations of all other tokenized words to generatethe equation packages. Each equation package includes a plurality ofequation elements describing the relationships between sequentiallyadjacent identigens of a plurality of sequential combinations ofidentigens.

The method continues at step 658 where the processing module selects asurviving equation package associated with a most favorableinterpretation. For example, the processing module applies rules (i.e.,inference, pragmatic engine, utilizing the identifiers of the identigensto match against known valid combinations of identifiers of entigens) toreduce the number of permutations of the sequential combinations ofidentigens to identify at least one equation package. Non-survivingequation packages are eliminated the compare unfavorably to pairingrules.

The method continues at step 659 where the processing module generates aquery response to the surviving equation package, where the survivingequation package is transformed to produce query knowledge for locatingthe portion of a knowledge database that includes an answer to thequery. As an example of generating the query response, the processingmodule interprets the surviving the equation package in accordance withanswer rules to produce the query knowledge (e.g., a graphicalrepresentation of knowledge when the knowledge database utilizes agraphical database format).

The processing module accesses fact base information from the knowledgedatabase to identify the portion of the knowledge database associatedwith a favorable comparison of the query knowledge (e.g., favorablecomparison of attributes of the query knowledge to the portion of theknowledge database, aligning favorably comparing entigens withoutconflicting entigens). The processing module extracts an answer from theportion of the knowledge database to produce the query response.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 9A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes test content sources 660, the AI server20-1 of FIG. 1 , and the user device 12-1 of FIG. 1 . The test contentsources 660 includes the content sources 16-1 through 16-N of FIG. 1 andprovides content generated, or retrieved, in response to one or moretest content requests 664 in accordance with a test response generatingapproach. The AI server 20-1 includes the processing module 50-1 of FIG.2 and the SS memory 96 of FIG. 2 . The processing module 50-1 includesthe collections module 120 of FIG. 4A, the IEI module 122 of FIG. 4A,and the query module 124 of FIG. 4A. Generally, an embodiment of theinvention presents solutions where the computing system 10 supportsverifying knowledge extraction from content.

In an example of operation of the verifying of the knowledge extractionfrom the content, the IEI module 122 determines one or more steps of anAI engine test sequence. The AI engine test sequence includes steps toexercise and validate one or more of processing capabilities,utilization of stored knowledge, and ability to gather furtherknowledge. The determining includes one or more of indicating to invokethe test sequence based on one or more of expiration of a test cycletime frame, detecting an anomaly, and interpreting an IEI request 244from the query module 124 based on a test request 662 from the userdevice 12-1. The determining of the one or more steps may be based onone or more of the test request 662, a previous test, a previous testresult, an interpretation of the anomaly, a historical test pattern, andidentifying which aspects to test (i.e., processing capabilities,utilization of the stored knowledge, gathering of the furtherknowledge).

When the one or more steps of the AI engine test sequence includesgathering further knowledge, the IEI module 122 facilitates collectionof test content to generate the further knowledge. The identifyingincludes one or more of identifying a deficiency of presently storedknowledge (e.g., fact base info 600 from the SS memory 96), untimelyknowledge, insufficient depth of understanding indicator, potentialinaccuracies, and an unfavorable level of ambiguity detected. Thefacilitating includes one or more of causing one or more contentcollection cycles, where each cycle includes the issuing a collectionsrequest 132 to the collections module 120, where the request includesone or more of a content type, the content source, information withregards to the identified deficiency, and a recommended test to generatetest content. The collections module 120 facilitates one or more testcontent collection cycles, where each cycle includes issuing one or moretest content requests 664 to one or more content sources 16-1 through16-N of the test content sources 660 cause receiving of test contentresponses 666.

One or more of the content sources dynamically generates content of thetest content responses 666 based on locally prestored content and a testresponse generating approach. The collections module 120 issues acollections response 134 to the IEI module 122 when favorable for thecontent has been collected (e.g., a goal of a content collectionexperiment has been met, a number of content sources have been query, asufficient volume of incremental content has been collected, one or moremandatory content sources have provided a model content, etc.).

The IEI module 122 processes the test content of the collectionsresponse 134 in accordance with the one or more steps of the AI enginetest sequence to produce the further knowledge for storage as fact baseinformation 600 in the SS memory 96. The IEI module 122 issues, inaccordance with the one or more steps of the EI engine test sequence, anIEI response 246 to the query module 124 in response to an IEI request244 from the query module 124. The query module 124 generates the IEIrequest 244 based on the test request 662 from the user device 12-1. TheIEI module 122 generates the IEI response 246 to include a response tothe test request 662 based on the further knowledge of the knowledgebase. The query module 124 issues a test response 668 to the user device12-1. The query module 124 generates the test response 668 to includethe response of the IEI response 246.

FIG. 9B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for verifyingknowledge extraction from content within a computing system. Inparticular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one ormore functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D,9A, and also FIG. 9B. The method includes step 680 where a processingmodule of one or more processing modules of one or more computingdevices of the computing system determines one or more steps of an AIengine test sequence. The determining includes indicating to invoke thetest sequence based on one or more of an expiration of a test cycle timeframe, detecting an anomaly, and interpreting a request. The determiningof the one or more steps may be based on one or more of the request, aprevious test, a previous test result, and interpretation of theanomaly, a historical test pattern, and identifying which aspects of thetest (i.e., processing capabilities, utilizing the stored knowledge, andgathering further knowledge).

The method continues at step 682 where the processing module facilitatescollection, in accordance with the one or more steps of the EI enginetest sequence, of test content to enable generation of furtherknowledge. The facilitating includes causing one or more contentcollection cycles, where each cycle includes issuing a collectionsrequest. The request indicates one or more of a content type, a contentsource, information with regards to an identified deficiency, and arecommended test to generate test content.

Each cycle includes issuing one or more test content requests to one ormore content sources of test content sources to cause retrieving of testresponses. One or more of the content sources dynamically generatescontent of the test content responses based on locally prestored contentand a test response generating approach. The processing moduledetermines that favorable further content has been collected when atleast one of satisfying at least one goal of a content collection testhas been met, a number of content sources have been queried, asufficient volume of an incremental content has been collected, and oneor more mandatory content sources have provided the incremental contentetc.

The method continues at step 684 where the processing module LEIprocesses the test content in accordance with the one or more steps ofthe AI engine test sequence to produce the further knowledge. Forexample, the processing module converts human expressions of the testcontent into computer representations as the further knowledge of thetest content, aggregates the further knowledge of the test content withpreviously stored knowledge to produce augmented knowledge, and utilizesthe augmented knowledge in a step of the one or more steps of the AIengine test sequence (e.g., to answer a question).

The method continues at step 686 the processing module generates aresult of execution of the one or more steps of the AI engine testsequence. The generating includes one or more of summarizing a result,comparing a result to a desired result, identifying a result recipient,generating a test result message, issuing the test result message to theidentified result recipient, and saving the result as a historicalresult for utilization in subsequent tests.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIGS. 10A-10D are schematic block diagrams of another embodiment of acomputing system illustrating an embodiment of a method for processing aquery. The computing system includes the content ingestion module 300 ofFIG. 5E, the element identification module 302 of FIG. 5E, theinterpretation module 304 of FIG. 5E, the answer resolution module 306of FIG. 5E, a knowledge database 700, and a data source 710. In anembodiment, the knowledge database 700 is implemented utilizing the factbase 592 of FIG. 8A. In an embodiment, the data source 710 isimplemented utilizing one or more of the content sources 16-1 through16-N.

FIG. 10A illustrates an example of the method of the processing of thequery where the content ingestion module 300 receives the query 701 andparses the query 701 to produce query words 702 that includes aplurality of words. For example, when the query includes “waterbordering states to Illinois?”, the content ingestion module 300produces the query words 702 to include “water”, “bordering”, “states”,and “to Illinois?”

The element identification module 302 identifies a set of identigens foreach word of the query to produce a plurality of sets of identigens 704.For example, the element identification module 302 accesses theknowledge database 700 utilizing the query words 702 to recoveridentigen information 703. The identigen information 703 includes, foreach word, a set of associated identigens. A set of identigens of theplurality of sets of identigens includes one or more different meaningsof a word of the query. For instance, an identigen set #1 is recoveredthat corresponds to the word “water” (e.g., noun water, verb water,etc.), and an entigen set #2 is recovered that corresponds to the word“bordering”, etc.

The interpretation module 304 interprets, utilizing language rules 705,the plurality of sets of identigens 704 to produce a query entigen group706. A query entigen of the query entigen group corresponds to anidentigen of the set identigens having a selected meaning of the one ormore different meanings of the word of the query. The language rules 705includes an indication of valid sequential permutations of identigens asfound in accordance with a particular language.

The query entigen group 706 represents a most likely interpretation ofthe query 701. An entigen group includes a plurality of entigens, whereeach entigen represents one of an object, a characteristic, and anaction. For example, the interpretation module 304 generates the queryentigen group 706 to include a placeholder object entigen for states, anaction entigen for borders, an object entigen for Illinois, and acharacteristic entigen for a water border entigen describing a type ofborder.

An entigen group further includes relationships between entigensincluding describes, acts on, is a, belongs to, did, did too, etc. Thequery entigen group 706 further includes a relationship between thestate entigen and the border entigen, a relationship between the borderentigen and the Illinois entigen, and a relationship between the waterborder entigen and the border entigen.

Having received the query entigen group 706, the answer resolutionmodule 306 obtains an initial answer entigen group 708 from theknowledge database 700 based on the query entigen group 706. An answerentigen of the initial answer entigen group 708 corresponds to a partialquery answer element (e.g., part of an answer to the query).

The obtaining of the initial answer entigen group 708 includesidentifying a group of entigens from entigen information 707 of theknowledge database 700 that compares favorably to the query entigengroup 706 as the initial answer entigen group 708. For example, theanswer resolution module 306 identifies a first answer entigen of theinitial answer entigen group that is substantially the same as a firstquery entigen of the query entigen group. For instance, the entigen for“Illinois” is identified in both the query entigen group 706 and anentigen of the knowledge database 700.

The answer resolution module 306 further identifies that a second answerentigen of the initial answer entigen group is substantially the same asa second query entigen of the query entigen group. For instance, theentigen for “border” is identified in both the query entigen group 706and another entigen of the knowledge database 700. The answer resolutionmodule 306 further identifies that a first entigen relationship betweenthe first and second query entigens of the query entigen group issubstantially the same as a second entigen relationship between thefirst and second answer entigens of the answer entigen group. Forinstance, the relationship is identified between the entigens for borderand Illinois of both the query entigen group 706 and the identifiedentigens of the knowledge database 700.

The identifying of common entigens and entigen relationships is carriedout to find a best matching entigen group of the knowledge database 700to the query entigen group 706. For example, the answer resolutionmodule 306 produces the initial answer entigen group 708 to include theIllinois entigen, the border entigen, and entigens for the states ofWisconsin, Missouri, Kentucky, Indiana, and Michigan since the knowledgedatabase 700 further indicates that those state names are valid states.It is noted that the state of Iowa is temporarily missing in thisexample which is further discussed with reference to FIG. 10B.

FIG. 10B further illustrates the example of the processing of the querywhere the answer resolution module 306 determines that a reliable anddefinitive answer for the query 701 is not obtainable from the initialanswer entigen group 708 based at least one root cause. A first rootcause is detectable when the initial answer entigen group 708 includesan incomplete answer entigen (e.g., missing characteristic entigen(s)).A second root cause is detectable when the initial answer entigen groupincludes an insufficient number of answer entigens (e.g., missing objectentigen(s)). A scenario associated with the incomplete answer entigen isdiscussed in greater detail with reference to FIG. 10C.

The determining that the reliable and definitive answer is notobtainable includes determining that the initial answer entigen group708 includes the insufficient number of answer entigens by a series ofsteps. A first step includes extracting a first characteristic, a firstaction, and a first object from a first answer entigen of the initialanswer entigen group. For example, the answer resolution module 306extracts the action entigen for bordering Illinois.

Having extracted the first answer entigen, a second step includes theanswer resolution module 306 generating a data query 711 based on thefirst characteristic, the first action, and the first object. Forexample, the answer resolution module 306 generates the data query 711to identify states bordering Illinois.

Having generated the data query 711, a third step includes the answerresolution module 306 querying one or more data sources (e.g., the datasource 710) based on the data query 711 to obtain a data response 712.For example, the answer resolution module 306 identifies the data source710 as a data source that likely contains content associated with thedata query (e.g., a list of states that border Illinois). Havingidentified the data source 710, the answer resolution module 306 sendsthe data query 711 to the data source 710.

In a fourth step, the content ingestion module 300 receives the dataresponse 712. For example, the content ingestion module 300 parses wordsof the data response including “states bordering Illinois includesWisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Kentucky, Indiana, and Michigan” to producedata response words 713.

In the fifth step, the element identification module 302 processes eachword of the data response word 713 to identify a set of identigens fromidentigen information 703 from the knowledge database 700 to produce aplurality of sets of data response identigens 714. In a sixth step, theinterpretation module 304 interprets the set of data response identigens714 in accordance with the language rules 705 of the knowledge database700 to produce a data response entigen group 715. For example, theinterpretation module 304 generates the data response entigen group 715to include an Illinois entigen, a border entigen, and entigens for thestates of Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Kentucky, Indiana, and Michigan.

Having received the data response entigen group 715, and a seventh step,the answer resolution module 306 determines that the data response 712does not correspond to the initial answer entigen group 708. Forexample, the answer resolution module 306 determines that the dataresponse entigen group 715 includes the state of Iowa and the initialanswer entigen group 708 does not include the state of Iowa (e.g., Iowawas missing from the initial knowledge database 700).

Having determined that the data response 712 does not correspond to theinitial answer entigen group 708, the answer resolution module 306generates a new answer entigen 716 based on the data response 712.Example, the answer resolution module 306 generates the new answerentigen 716 to represent the state of Iowa. The answer resolution module306 adds the new answer entigen 716 to the initial answer entigen group708 to produce a second updated answer entigen group 717. For example,the answer resolution module 306 establishes a relationship between theIowa entigen and the border entigen. In addition, the answer resolutionmodule 306 updates the knowledge database 700 with the second updatedanswer entigen group 717 (e.g., Iowa is added to the knowledge database700).

Having produced the second updated answer entigen group 717, the answerresolution module 306 determines whether the reliable and definitiveanswer is obtainable by comparing the second updated answer entigengroup 717 to the query entigen group 706. For example, the answerresolution module 306 indicates that the reliable and definitive answeris not obtainable due to the incomplete answer entigen when the queryentigen group 706 includes the water border characteristic entigen andthe second updated answer entigen group 717 does not. Resolution of theincomplete answer entigen is discussed in greater detail with referenceto FIG. 10C.

When the second updated answer entigen group 717 produces the reliableand definitive answer, the answer resolution module 306 outputs thereliable and definitive answer. In another example, the reliable anddefinitive answer is obtainable when the query entigen group 706 doesnot include the water border entigen (e.g., when the query simply askswhich states border Illinois).

FIG. 10C further illustrates the example of the processing of the querywhere the answer resolution module 306 determines that the reliable anddefinitive answer for the query is not obtainable from the initialanswer entigen group 708 due to the initial answer entigen groupincluding the incomplete answer entigen. The determining that theinitial answer entigen group includes the incomplete answer entigenincludes a series of steps.

A first step includes the answer resolution module 306 identifying afirst answer entigen of the initial answer entigen group 708 that issubstantially the same as a first query entigen of the query entigengroup 706. For example, the answer resolution module 306 identifies theborder entigen to be the same between the query entigen group 706 andthe initial answer entigen group 708.

A second step includes the answer resolution module 306 determining thata number of a first set of entigen relationships between the first queryentigen and a first set of related query entigens of the query entigengroup is greater than a number of a second set of entigen relationshipsbetween the first answer entigen and a second set of related answerentigens of the answer entigen group. For example, the answer resolutionmodule 306 determines that the border entigen of the query entigen group706 has one more relationship (e.g., the water border entigenrelationship) than the border entigen of the initial answer entigengroup 708. The answer resolution module 306 identifies the water borderentigen as the incomplete answer entigen 720.

When the incomplete answer entigen is a cause for the inability toobtain the reliable and definitive answer, the answer resolution module306 determines, for the incomplete answer entigen 720, a missing elementof a set of elements that includes a characteristic, an action, and anobject. For example, the answer resolution module 306 identifies acharacteristic of bordering by water as the missing element.

Having identified the missing element, the answer resolution module 306obtains data regarding the missing element. For example, the answerresolution module 306 issues a data request 721 to the data source 710,where the data request 721 looks for water border characteristics. Theanswer resolution module 306 selects the data source 710 when the datasource 710 is known to include content associated with water bordercharacteristics (e.g., geography references, etc.).

Having issued the data request 721 to the data source 710, the contentingestion module 300 parses words of data 722 from the data source 710in response to the data request 721. For example, the content ingestionmodule 300 produces data words 723 from the data that includes “waterborder types include sea, ocean, river, canal, lake.”

The element identification module 302 generates a set of identigensutilizing identigens information 703 from the knowledge database 700 foreach word of the data words 723 to produce sets of data identigens 724.The interpretation module 304 interprets the sets of data identigens 724in accordance with the language rules 705 from the knowledge database700 to produce a data entigen group 726. For example, the interpretationmodule 304 generates a water border entigen that is associated withentigens for types of water borders including sea, ocean, river, canal,and lake.

The answer resolution module 306 updates the incomplete answer entigen720 with the data 722 to produce an updated answer entigen 725. Thetypes of water borders establish updated answer entigens 725 for theinitial answer entigen group 708.

Having produced the updated answer entigen 725, the answer resolutionmodule 306 updates the initial answer entigen group 708 with the updatedanswer entigen 725 to produce an updated answer entigen group 727. Forexample, the water border entigen and associated water bordercharacteristic entigens are attached to the border entigen. In anembodiment, the answer resolution module 306 updates the knowledgedatabase 700 with the updated answer entigen group 727.

The answer resolution module 306 determines whether the reliable anddefinitive answer is obtainable based on the updated answer entigengroup 727. For example, the answer resolution module 306 indicates thatthe reliable and definitive answer is not obtainable when the waterborder entigen includes only characteristic entigens that do notindicate specific example object bodies of water as is sought by thequery. The resolution is discussed in greater detail with reference toFIG. 10D. When the updated answer entigen group 727 produces thereliable and definitive answer, the answer resolution module 306 outputsthe reliable and definitive answer.

FIG. 10D further illustrates the example of the processing of the querywhere the answer resolution module 306 has determined that the updatedanswer entigen group 727 does not produce the reliable and definitiveanswer. The answer resolution module 306 identifies a further incompleteanswer entigen(s) 730 of the updated answer entigen group 727. Forexample, the answer resolution module 306 identifies a need for specificobject entigens that relate to the types of water borders.

The answer resolution module 306 determines, for the further incompleteanswer entigen 730, a further missing element of the set of elementsthat includes the characteristic, the action, and the object. Forexample, which lakes and rivers (e.g., objects) provide water bordersbetween states bordering Illinois and Illinois.

Having identified the further missing element, the answer resolutionmodule 306 obtains further data regarding the further missing element.For example, the answer resolution module 306 issues a further datarequest 731 to the data source 710 requesting specific examples of waterborders by type (e.g., sea, ocean, river, canal, lake) with Illinois.The content ingestion module 300 and receives further data 732 from thedata source 710 and parses the further data 732 to produce further datawords 733. For example, the content ingestion module 300 produces thefurther data words 733 from further data that includes “Illinois waterborders: sea—none; ocean—none; canal—none; river—Mississippi River(e.g., Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Kentucky,), Ohio River (e.g.,Kentucky, Indiana); and lake—Lake Michigan (e.g., Wisconsin, Michigan,Indiana).”

The element identification module 302 utilizes identigens information703 from the knowledge database 700 to identify a set of identigens foreach word of the further data words 733 to produce sets of further dataidentigens 734. The interpretation module 304 utilizes the languagerules 705 from the knowledge database 700 to interpret the sets offurther data identigens 734 to produce a further data entigen group 735as a most likely meaning of the further data 732. For example, thefurther data entigen group 735 includes an entigen for the MississippiRiver coupled to an entigen for river coupled to an entigen for waterborder coupled to entigens for the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri,and Kentucky, etc.

Having received the further data entigen group 735, the answerresolution module 306 updates the further incomplete answer entigen 730with the further data 732 to produce a further updated answer entigen(e.g., entigens of the Mississippi River, the Ohio River, and LakeMichigan). Having produced the further updated answer entigens, theanswer resolution module 306 updates the updated answer entigen group727 with the further updated answer entigens to produce a furtherupdated answer entigen group 736. In an embodiment, the answerresolution module 306 updates the knowledge database 700 with thefurther updated answer entigen group 736. An example of the furtherupdated answer entigen group 736 is discussed in greater detail withreference to FIG. 10E.

The answer resolution module 306 determines whether the reliable anddefinitive answer is obtainable from the further updated answer entigengroup 736. For example, the answer resolution module 306 indicates thatthe reliable and definitive answer is obtainable when the furtherupdated answer entigen group 736 includes the specific examples of thewater borders. When the further updated answer entigen group 736produces the reliable and definitive answer, the answer resolutionmodule 306 outputs the reliable and definitive answer. An example of thereliable and definitive answer is discussed in greater detail withreference to FIG. 10E.

The method described above in conjunction with the content ingestionmodule 300, the element identification module 302, the interpretationmodule 304, and the answer resolution module 306 can alternatively beperformed by other modules of the computing system 10 of FIG. 1 or byother devices. In addition, at least one memory section (e.g., acomputer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readable storagemedium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized into a firstmemory element, a second memory element, a third memory element, afourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices of the computing system 10,cause the one or more computing devices to perform any or all of themethod described above.

FIG. 10E is a data structure diagram of an example of a further updatedanswer entigen group 736. The further updated answer entigen group 736includes, for each state bordering Illinois, a water border entigen withrelevant examples of water border type entigens. For each relevant waterborder type entigen, there are object entigens listing examples ofactual bodies of water. For example, a first portion of the furtherupdated answer entigen group 736 includes entigens for the MississippiRiver and Lake Michigan as example water borders between Wisconsin andIllinois.

The reliable and definitive answer is produced from the further updatedanswer entigen group 736 by deductive reasoning examining instances ofstates bordering Illinois where at least one specific water border isincluded. For example, the reliable and definitive answer includes“water bordering states of Illinois are Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri,Kentucky, Indiana, and Michigan.”

When the knowledge database is updated utilizing the further updatedanswer entigen group 736, subsequent further reliable and definitiveanswers are enabled for associated further queries. For example, it isnoted that a query of “of states bordering Illinois with a water border,which states include only a lake border?” A reliable and definitiveanswer is readily available by utilizing the updated knowledge database.For example, the answer to the further query includes “Michigan is theonly state that borders Illinois with only a lake border”.

FIG. 11A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes a hacker device 740, a plurality ofcomputing devices 742-1 through 742-N, the AI server 20-1 of FIG. 1 ,and the user device 12-1 of FIG. 1 . The hacker device 740 includes anydevice capable of issuing an improper access request 752 of a potentialplurality of improper access requests 752-1 through 752-N. The improperaccess request 752 is intended to attack a security vulnerability of thecomputing devices 742-1 through 742-N (e.g., to cause the computingdevice to perform an undesired action such as providing confidentialinformation).

Each computing device 742-1 through 742-N may be implemented utilizingany type of computing system or device that may be vulnerable to theimproper access request 752. The AI server 20-1 includes the processingmodule 50-1 of FIG. 2 and the SS memory 96 of FIG. 2 . The processingmodule 50-1 includes the collections module 120 of FIG. 4A, the IEImodule 122 of FIG. 4A, and the query module 124 of FIG. 4A. Generally,an embodiment of the invention presents solutions where the computingsystem 10 supports detecting an unfavorable security condition.

In an example of operation of the detecting of the unfavorable securitycondition, the IEI module 122 determines, in response to a securitystatus request 748 received from the user device 12-1 (i.e., computingdevice identifiers, request to identify the hacker device, a request toidentify a hacking approach, request to identify security aspects of thehacking approach including encryption keys, device identifiers, etc.),descriptors of required security content to facilitate subsequentlyissuing a security status response 750 to the user device 12-1. Thedetermining includes interpreting an IEI request 244 from the querymodule 124. The IEI request 244 is based on the security status request748, identifying the devices, identify potential vulnerabilities basedon knowledge of the fact base info 600 from SS memory 96, andidentifying a timeliness requirement of gathering the required securitycontent.

The IEI module 122 facilitates gathering the required security content.For example, the facilitating includes issuing a collections request 132to the collections module 120, where the collections request 132 isbased on the descriptors of the required security content. Thecollections module 120 issues, for each identified computing device ofthe computing devices 742-1 through 742-N, a security content request744 of security content requests 744-1 through 744-N (i.e., request forhacking information).

Each computing device generates a corresponding security contentresponse 746 of security content responses 746-1 through 746-N based oncontent associated with one or more improper access request 752 ofimproper access request 752-1 through 752-N. The collections module 120generates a collections response 134 based on the received securitycontent responses. The collections response 134 provides the requiredsecurity content.

The IEI module 122 IEI processes the required security content of thecollections response 134 to produce the further security knowledge forstorage as fact base information 600 and the SS memory 96 (e.g.,interpret human expressions to produce identigen groupings for each wordof the content, apply rules to identify a unique entigen for eachidentigen grouping, compare resulting groupings of entigens to knowledgeof the fact base info 600 to provide the further security knowledge).The IEI module 122 issues, in response to the security status request748, an IEI response 246 to the query module 124.

The IEI module 122 generates the IEI response 246 to include aspects ofthe hacking device (e.g., an identifier of the hacker device, anInternet address of the hacker device, identifiers of attempted hacks,identifiers of improper encryption keys utilized, identification of ahacking approach, an estimated next attack, estimated next improperencryption keys, a security recommendation to abate for the potentialrisk) based on the further security knowledge of the knowledge base. Thequery module 124 issues the security status response 750 to the userdevice 12-1 and where the query module 124 generates the security statusresponse 750 based on the IEI response 246.

FIG. 11B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for detectingan unfavorable security condition within a computing system. Inparticular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one ormore functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D,11A, and also FIG. 11B. The method includes step 760 where a processingmodule of one or more processing modules of one or more computingdevices of the computing system determines descriptors of requiredsecurity content with regards to hacking. The determining includes oneor more of interpreting a security status request, receiving a securityalert, indicating to determine the descriptors, and identifyingdescriptors associated with aspects of at least one of the request andthe alert (e.g., identify a source of the hacking, identify victims ofthe hacking, identify a hacking approach, identify a hacking pattern,etc.).

The method continues at step 762 where the processing module facilitatesgathering the required security content. The facilitating includes oneor more of issuing security content requests to the victims of thehacking, receiving security content responses, and aggregating thesecurity content responses to produce the required security content.

The method continues at step 764 where the processing module LEIprocesses the required security content to produce further securityknowledge, where the further security knowledge includes a predictiveaspect. The processing includes IEI processing the required securitycontent to produce the further security knowledge that includes thepredictive aspect (e.g., predict subsequent hacking based on thedetected hacking pattern, etc.).

The method continues at step 766 where the processing module issues asecurity status response to include aspects of the hacking based on thefurther security knowledge. The issuing includes one or more ofgenerating the security status response to include aspects of thehacking based on the further security knowledge. The aspects of thehacking includes the predictive aspect and may further include arecommended countermeasure for the predicted subsequent hacking (i.e.,different encryption, an updated timeliness to change encryption keys,etc.).

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 12A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes the element identification module 302 ofFIG. 5E and the interpretation module 304 of FIG. 5E. The elementidentification module 302 includes the element matching module 400 ofFIG. 6A and the element grouping module 402 of FIG. 6A. Theinterpretation module 304 includes the grouping matching module 404 ofFIG. 6A and the grouping interpretation module 406 of FIG. 6A.Generally, an embodiment of the invention presents solutions where thecomputing system 10 supports optimizing knowledge extraction fromcontent.

In an example of operation of the optimizing of the knowledgeextraction, when matching elements of received formatted content 314,the element matching module 400 generates matched elements 412. Thegenerating includes one or more of matching a received element to anelement of an element list 332. The element list 332 further includesidentification of one or more objects, verbs, and adjectives, andoutputs the matched elements 412 to include an identifier of the matchedelement.

The element grouping module 402 analyzes the matched elements 412 inaccordance with element rules 318, where the element rules 318 furtherincludes workgroup permutation rules, to produce identified elementinformation 340 when a favorable word grouping is associated with thematched elements 412 in accordance with the element rules 318, andproduces grouping information 780. The grouping information 780 includesidentified valid and/or invalid word groupings based on listen rules,permutations of possible word grouping meanings based on a predicteddomain, and intermediate grouping, an adjective skipping rule, etc. Theanalyzing includes comparing the matched elements 412 with word grouppermutation rules of the element rules 318 and extracting possible wordgroup meanings from the element rules 318.

The grouping matching module 404 analyzes the identified elementinformation 340 and grouping information 780 in accordance with agrouping list 334 to produce validated groupings information 416. Theproducing includes comparing a groupings aspect of the identifiedelement information 340 in light of the grouping information 780 (e.g.,for each permutation of groups of elements of possible interpretations).The producing further includes generating the validated groupingsinformation 416 to include identification of valid permutations thatalign with a groupings list in light of the grouping information 780(e.g., eliminate in valid permutations right away that are inconsistentwith domain, contacts, etc.).

The grouping interpretation module 406 interprets the validatedgroupings information 416 based on question information 346 and inaccordance with the interpretation rules 320 to produce interpretedinformation 344 (e.g., most likely interpretations, next likelyinterpretations, etc.). The producing may be based on the plurality ofpossible meanings of the word grouping, pruning the plurality ofpossible meanings based on the interpretation rules 320 in light ofother words of the validated groupings information 416 (e.g., eliminatea meaning when the word grouping does not align with other aspects asindicated by the grouping information 780). The interpreting furtherincludes outputting and interpretation of the word grouping thatincludes a meaning of a word group that survives the pruning.

FIG. 12B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for optimizingknowledge extraction within a computing system. In particular, a methodis presented for use in conjunction with one or more functions andfeatures described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D, 12A, and also FIG.12B. The method includes step 790 where a processing module of one ormore processing modules of one or more computing devices of thecomputing system, when matching elements of received formatted contentof an ingested phrase of words, generates matched elements in accordancewith an element list. The element list may further includeidentification of one or more objects, verbs, adjectives. The generatingmay further include outputting the matched elements to include anidentifier of each matched element.

The method continues at step 792 where the processing module analyzesthe matched elements in accordance with element rules to producegrouping information and identified element information, where theelement rules includes workgroup permutation rules. The analyzingincludes comparing matched elements with word group permutation rules ofthe element rules, extracting possible word group meanings from theelement rules based on one or more of a predicted domain, anintermediate grouping, and an adjective skipping rule, etc.

The method continues at step 794 where the processing module analyzesthe identified element information and grouping information inaccordance with a groupings list to produce validated groupingsinformation. The analyzing includes one or more of comparing a groupingsaspect of the identified element information in light of the groupinginformation (e.g., for each permutation of groups of elements ofpossible interpretations) and generating the validated groupingsinformation to include identification of valid permutations that alignwith the groupings list in light of the grouping information (e.g.,eliminate in valid permutations right away that are inconsistent withone or more of a domain, a context, etc.).

The method continues at step 796 where the processing module interpretsthe validated groupings information in accordance with interpretationrules to produce interpreted information, where invalid permutations ofword group meanings have substantially been eliminated. For example, theprocessing module, based on the plurality of possible meanings of agiven workgroup, prunes the plurality of possible meanings based on theinterpretation rules in light of other words of the validated groupingsinformation of the phrase (e.g., eliminate a meaning when the wordgrouping does not align with other aspects as indicated by the groupinginformation). The processing module outputs and interpretation of thephrase that includes a meaning of the word group that survives thepruning.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 13A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes psychoanalysis content sources 810, theAI server 20-1 of FIG. 1 , and the user device 12-1 of FIG. 1 . Thepsychoanalysis content sources 810 includes the content sources 16-1through 16-N of FIG. 1 and provides content generated, or retrieved, inresponse to one or more psychoanalysis content request 814 in accordancewith a psychoanalysis response generating approach, where the contentincludes one or more of psychoanalysis test results, psychoanalysisprofiles, previous psychoanalysis diagnostic information, andpsychoanalysis data for an individual. The AI server 20-1 includes theprocessing module 50-1 of FIG. 2 and the SS memory 96 of FIG. 2 . Theprocessing module 50-1 includes the collections module 120 of FIG. 4A,the IEI module 122 of FIG. 4A, and the query module 124 of FIG. 4A.Generally, an embodiment of the invention presents solutions where thecomputing system 10 supports performing an analysis.

In an example of operation of the performing of the analysis, the IEImodule 122 identifies required psychoanalysis content (e.g.,psychoanalysis test results, profiles, previous diagnostic information,data by group, data by individual, particular psychoanalysis analysiscontent source information) to provide a psychoanalysis response 818 tothe user device 12-1 in response to a psychoanalysis request 812. Therequest includes one or more of general psychoanalysis data, specificpsychoanalysis data, likelihood of factual statements, psychoanalysisquestions, etc.). For example, the identifying includes interpreting anIEI request 244 from the query module 124, where the query module 124receives the psychoanalysis request 812 from the user device 12-1,identifying a diagnostic type based on the request and a list from thefact base 600, and alternatively performing pre-IEI processing on a datasample of the psychoanalysis request 812 to identify a diagnostic aspectassociated with the required psychoanalysis content.

The IEI module 122 facilitates collection of the required psychoanalysiscontent to generate further knowledge. The facilitating includes causingone or more content collection cycles, where each cycle includes the IEImodule 122 issuing a collections request 132 to the collections module120. The request indicates one or more of a content type, a contentsource, information with regards to the required psychoanalysis content.

The collections module 120 facilitates one or more psychoanalysiscontent collection cycles, where each cycle includes issuing one or morepsychoanalysis content request 814 to the one or more content sources16-1 through 16-N of the psychoanalysis content sources 810 to causereceiving of psychoanalysis content responses 816. One or more of thecontent sources dynamically generates content of the psychoanalysiscontent responses 816 based on locally prestored content and apsychoanalysis content response generating approach.

The collections module 120 issues a collections response 134 to the IEImodule 122 (e.g., an aggregate of psychoanalysis content) when favorablepsychoanalysis content has been collected. Favorable content is detectedwhen a goal of a content collection cycle has been met, a number ofcontent sources have been queried, a sufficient volume of a criminalcontent has been collected, one or more mandatory content sources haveprovided a terminal content, etc.

The IEI module 122 IEI processes the psychoanalysis content of thecollections response 134 in accordance with the psychoanalysis request812 to produce further knowledge for storage as fact base information600 and the SS memory 96. For example, the IEI processing includesinterpreting human expressions to produce identigen groupings for eachword of the content, applying rules to identify a unique entigen foreach identigen grouping, and comparing resulting groupings of entigensto knowledge of the fact base info 600 to provide the further knowledge.

The IEI module 122 issues, in accordance with the psychoanalysis request812, an IEI response 246 to the query module 124, where the IEI module122 generates the IEI response 246 to include a response to thepsychoanalysis request 812 based on the further knowledge of theknowledge base. The query module 124 issues the psychoanalysis response818 to the user device 12-1. The query module 124 generates thepsychoanalysis response 818 to include at least some of the IEI response246.

FIG. 13B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for performingan analysis within a computing system. In particular, a method ispresented for use in conjunction with one or more functions and featuresdescribed in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D, 13A, and also FIG. 13B. Themethod includes step 830 where a processing module of one or moreprocessing modules of one or more computing devices of the computingsystem identifies required psychoanalysis content to provide apsychoanalysis response to a psychoanalysis request. The identifyingincludes one or more of interpreting the psychoanalysis request,identifying a diagnostic type based on the request and a list from aknowledge base, and alternatively performing pre-IEI processing on adata sample of the psychoanalysis request to identify a diagnosticaspect associated with the required psychoanalysis content.

The method continues at step 832 where the processing module facilitatescollection of the required psychoanalysis content to facilitatesubsequent generation of further knowledge. As an example of thefacilitating, the processing module causes one or more contentcollection cycles, where each cycle includes issuing a collectionsrequest. The request indicates one or more of a content type, a contentsource, information with regards to the required psychoanalysis content,and to facilitate one or more psychoanalysis content collection cycles.

Each cycle includes issuing one or more psychoanalysis content requeststo one or more content sources of psychoanalysis content to causereceiving of psychoanalysis content responses. One or more of thecontent sources dynamically generates content of the psychoanalysiscontent responses based on locally prestored content and apsychoanalysis content response generating approach. The processingmodule further causes issuing of a collections response when favorablepsychoanalysis content has been collected (e.g., a goal of a contentcollection cycle has been met, in number of content sources have beenquery, a sufficient number of incremental content has been collected,one or more mandatory content sources have provided a criminal content,etc.).

The method continues at step 834 where the processing module IEIprocesses the psychoanalysis content in accordance with thepsychoanalysis request to produce the further knowledge. For example,the processing module processes the content to determine meaning andstore the knowledge associated with the meaning in the knowledge base.As another example, the IEI processing includes interpreting humanexpressions to produce identigen groupings for each word of the content,applying rules to identify a unique entigen for each identigen grouping,and comparing resulting groupings of entigens to knowledge of theknowledge base to provide the further knowledge.

The method continues at step 836 where the processing module issues thepsychoanalysis response based on the further knowledge. For example, theprocessing module generates the response based on responding to one ormore aspects of the psychoanalysis request and sends the psychoanalysisresponse to a requesting entity.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 14A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes the content ingestion module 300 of FIG.5E and the element identification module 302 of FIG. 5E. The contentingestion module 300 includes an element type module 850 and an elementvaluation module 852. The element identification module 302 includes theelement matching module 400 of FIG. 6A and the element grouping module402 of FIG. 6A. Generally, an embodiment of the invention presentssolutions where the computing system 10 supports representing numbers ina knowledge base.

In an example of operation of the representing of the numbers, theelement type module 850 analyzes source content 310 in accordance withan element list 332 to produce typed content 854. The element list 332includes numbers types and the typed content 854 includes a typeindicator (e.g., textual representations: text characters, word symbols,text groups; numeric representations: numeric digits, numeric words,numeric symbols, numeric groups). The analyzing includes comparingelements of the source content 310 to element type indicators of theelement list 332 and indicating a numeric representation when afavorable match occurs for a numerical type indicator of the elementlist 332.

The element valuation module 852 interprets the typed content 854 inaccordance with element rules 318 to produce formatted content 314 andto produce value information 856. The value information 856 includespossible values of identified numbers contained in identified charactersets of the source content 310 and the element rules 318 includesnumbers valuation rules. As an example of the interpreting, the elementvaluation module 852 indicates a possible value when a numericalcharacter set is recognized and compares favorably with the numbersvaluation rules of the element rules 318.

The element matching module 400 interprets the formatted content 314 inaccordance with the element list 332 and the value information 856 toproduce matched elements 412. As an example of the interpreting, theelement matching module 400 generates the matched elements 412 using afavorable numbers list of the element list 332 that are identifiedwithin the formatted content 314 commensurate with the value information856 for a valid representation of numbers.

The element grouping module 402 analyzes permutations of words of thematched elements 412 in accordance with the element rules 318 and thevalue information 856 to produce identified element information 340 andgrouped value information 858. The grouped value information 858includes values of numbers contained in identified valid and/or invalidword groupings based on the rules and permutations of possible wordgroupings based on numbers values. The element rules 318 includesnumbers groupings rules. As an example of analyzing, the elementgrouping module 402, of a plurality of possible limitations ofworkgroups of the matched elements 412, identifies a subset of mostvalid identified workgroups where the value information 856 comparesfavorably to valid numerics in accordance with the numbers groupingsrules of the element rules 318.

FIG. 14B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forrepresenting numbers in a knowledge base within a computing system. Inparticular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one ormore functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D,14A, and also FIG. 14B. The method includes step 870 where a processingmodule of one or more processing modules of one or more computingdevices of the computing system analyzes source content in accordancewith an element list to produce typed content, where the element listincludes numbers types, and where the typed content includes a typeindicator. For example, the processing module compares elements of thesource content to element type indicators of the element list andindicates a numeric representation when a favorable match occurs for anumerical type indicator of the element list.

The method continues at step 872 where the processing module interpretsthe typed content in accordance with element rules to produce formattedcontent and value information, where the value information includespossible values of identified numbers contained in identified charactersets of the source content, and where the element rules includes numbersvaluation rules. For example, the processing module indicates a possiblevalue when a numerical character set is recognized in accordance withthe numbers valuation rules.

The method continues at step 874 where the processing module interpretsthe formatted content in accordance with the element rules and the valueinformation to produce matched elements. For example, the processingmodule generates the matched elements when a favorable numbers list ofthe element rules is identified within the formatted contentcommensurate with the value information for a valid representation ofnumbers.

The method continues at step 876 where the processing module analyzespermutations of words of the matched elements in accordance with theelement rules and the value information to produce identified elementinformation and value information. The grouped value informationincludes values of numbers contained in identified valid and/or invalidword groupings. The values of the numbers contained in the identifiedvalid and/or invalid word groupings may be based on the element rulesand for permutations of possible word groupings based on number values.

The element rules include numbers groupings rules. For example, theprocessing module identifies, for a plurality of possible permutationsof word groups of the matched elements, a subset of most valididentified word groups. The value information compares favorably tovalid numerics in accordance with the numbers groupings rules of theelement rules.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 15A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes the element identification module 302 ofFIG. 5E and the interpretation module 304 of FIG. 5E. The elementidentification module 302 includes the element matching module 400 ofFIG. 6A and the element grouping module 402 of FIG. 6A. Theinterpretation module 304 includes the grouping matching module 404 ofFIG. 6A and the grouping interpretation module 406 of FIG. 6A.Generally, an embodiment of the invention presents solutions where thecomputing system 10 supports processing an unknown word.

In an example of operation of the processing of the unknown word, theelement matching module 400 analyzes formatted content 314 in accordancewith an element list 332 to produce matched elements 412 when matchingwords of the formatted content 314 to words of the element list 332 andfurther produces un-matched elements 890 when a word of the formattedcontent 314 does not match any of the words of the element list 332. Asan example of analyzing, the element matching module 400 generates theun-matched elements 890 to include the unmatched word when the word ofthe formatted content 314 does not match the words of the element list332.

The element grouping module 402 analyzes the matched elements 412 inaccordance with element rules 318 to produce identified elementinformation 340 with regards to the matched words and further producesun-identified element information 892 for each of the unmatched words.The analyzing includes, for an un-matched word, generating theun-identified element information 892 to include one or more of anobject identifier, a characteristic type identifier, and an action typeidentifier (e.g., where each type identifier is a temporary identifierfor a subsequent narrowing to just one type).

The grouping matching module 404 analyzes the identified elementinformation 340 in accordance with a groupings list 334 and theun-identified element information 892 to produce validated groupingsinformation 416 associated with potentially valid groupings of known andone or more unknown words. The analyzing includes one or more ofgenerating the validated groupings information 416 to includepotentially valid permutations of word groupings, where each permutationis associated with just one of the object, the characteristic, and theaction type of each unknown word.

The grouping interpretation module 406 analyzes the validated groupingsinformation 416 in accordance with interpretation rules 320, the elementlist 332, the un-identified element information 892, and questioninformation 346 to produce estimated content 894 when interpreting theword grouping utilizing an estimated word from the element list 332 inplace of an unknown word. When interpreting the word grouping of knownwords (e.g., a second pass), the grouping interpretation module 406outputs interpreted information 344 that includes an interpretation of aword grouping where every unknown word has been replaced with a knownword. Alternatively, or in addition to, the grouping interpretationmodule 406 requests user input to decide on a choice between two or morewords for an unknown word when a quality level of reducing a number ofestimated words is below a quality threshold level.

FIG. 15B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method for processingan unknown word within a computing system. In particular, a method ispresented for use in conjunction with one or more functions and featuresdescribed in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D, 15A, and also FIG. 15B. Themethod includes step 900 where a processing module of one or moreprocessing modules of one or more computing devices of the computingsystem analyzes formatted content in accordance with an element list toproduce matched elements when matching words of the formatted content toknown words of the element list and produces un-matched elements when anun-matched word of the formatted content does not match any of the wordsof the element list. The analyzing includes, when a word does not match,generating the un-matched elements to include the unmatched word.

The method continues at step 902 where the processing module analyzesthe matched elements in accordance with the element rules to produceidentified element information with regards to matched words and furtherproduces un-identified element information for each of the un-matchedwords. The analyzing includes, for an un-matched word, generating theun-identified element information to include one of an object typeidentifier, a characteristic type identifier, and an action typeidentifier (e.g., where each type identifier is a temporary identifierfor subsequent narrowing to just one type).

The method continues at step 904 where the processing module analyzesthe identified element information in accordance with a groupings listand the un-identified element information to produce validated groupingsinformation associated with potentially valid groupings of known andpotentially one or more unknown words. The analyzing includes generatingthe validated groupings information to include potentially validpresentations of word groupings. Each permutation is associated withjust one of the object type identifier, the characteristic typeidentifier, and the action type identifier of each unknown word.

The method continues at step 904 where the processing module analyzesthe validated groupings information in accordance with interpretationrules, the element list, the un-identified element information, andquestion information to produce estimated content when interpreting aword grouping utilizing an estimated word from the element list in placeof an unknown word. The analyzing includes, when interpreting the wordgrouping of known words (e.g., a second pass, outputting interpretedinformation that includes an interpretation of a word grouping whereevery unknown word has been replaced with a known word. Alternatively,or in addition to, the processing module obtains user input to selectbetween two or more words for an unknown word when a quality level ofproduction of possible valid words is below a quality threshold level.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 16A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of acomputing system that includes the content ingestion module 300 of FIG.5E and the element identification module 302 of FIG. 5E. The contentingestion module 300 includes the element type module 850 of FIG. 14Aand an element translation module 910. The element identification module302 includes the element matching module 400 of FIG. 6A and the elementgrouping module 402 of FIG. 6A. Generally, an embodiment of theinvention presents solutions where the computing system 10 supportsrepresenting mathematical symbols.

In an example of operation of the representing of the mathematicalsymbols, the element type module 850 analyzes source content 310 inaccordance with an element list 332 to produce mathematicalrepresentation content 912. The element list 332 includes mathematicalrepresentation types. The mathematical representation content 912includes a portion of the source content that includes mathematicalrepresentations and an indicator for the mathematical representations(e.g., mathematical symbols). The analyzing includes comparing elementsof the source content 310 to element type indicators of the element list332 and indicating a mathematical representation when a favorable matchoccurs for a mathematical representation type indicator of the elementlist 332.

The element translation module 910 interprets the mathematicalrepresentation content 912 in accordance with element rules 318 toproduce formatted content 314 and symbolic representation information914. The symbolic representation information 914 includes mathematicalrepresentations including one or more of characters, formulas,variables, constants, etc. in identified character sets of the sourcecontent 310. The element rules 318 includes mathematical representationrules.

The element matching module 400 interprets the formatted content 314 inaccordance with the element list 332 and the symbolic representationinformation 914 to produce matched elements 412 and graphicalrepresentation information 916. As an example of the interpreting, thematched elements 412 are generated when a mathematical representationslist of the element list 332 is identified within the formatted content314 commensurate with the symbolic representation information 914 for avalid representation of mathematical representations and generates thegraphical representation information 916 to include candidate textualrepresentations of the mathematical representations of the symbolicrepresentation information 914 (e.g., 3=three, +=plus, etc.).

The element grouping module 402 analyzes permutations of words of thematched elements 412 in accordance with the element rules 318 and thegraphical representation information 916 to produce identified elementinformation 340 and grouped graphical representation information 918.The group graphical representation information 918 includes grouptextual representations of the mathematical recitations in identifiedvalid and/or invalid word groupings based on the listed rules andpermutations of possible word groupings.

The element rules 318 includes mathematical representation groupingrules. As an example of analyzing, the element grouping module 402identifies, for a plurality of permutations of possible word groupings,a subset of most valid identified word groups where the group graphicalrepresentation information 918 compares favorably to valid mathematicalrepresentations in accordance with the mathematical representationgroupings rules of the element rules 318.

FIG. 16B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forrepresenting mathematical symbols within a computing system. Inparticular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one ormore functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D,16A, and also FIG. 16B. The method includes step 930 where a processingmodule of one or more processing modules of one or more computingdevices of the computing system analyzes source content in accordancewith an element list to produce mathematical representation content,where the element list includes mathematical representation types andwhere the mathematical representation content includes a portion of thesource content that includes mathematical representations and anindicator for the mathematical representations. For example, theprocessing module compares elements of the source content to elementtype indicators of the element list and indicates a mathematicalrepresentation when a favorable match occurs for a mathematicalrepresentation type indicator of the element list.

The method continues at step 932 where the processing module interpretsthe mathematical representation content in accordance with element rulesto produce formatted content and symbolic representation information.The symbolic representation information includes mathematicalrepresentations and where the element rules includes mathematicalrepresentation rules. For example, the processing module indicates asymbolic representation when a mathematical representation character setis recognized and is in favorable accordance with mathematicalrepresentation rules of the element rules.

The method continues at step 934 where the processing module interpretsthe formatted content in accordance with the element list and thesymbolic representation information to produce matched elements andgraphical representation information. For example, the processing modulegenerates the matched elements when a mathematical representations listof the element list is identified within the formatted contentcommensurate with the symbolic representation information for a validrepresentation of mathematical representations and generates thegraphical representation information to include candidate textualrepresentations of the mathematical representations of the symbolicrepresentation information (e.g., 3=three, +=plus, etc.).

The method continues at step 936 where the processing module analyzespermutations of words of the matched elements in accordance with theelement rules in the graphical representation information to produceidentified element information and graphical representation information.The grouped graphical representation information includes group textualrepresentations of the mathematical representations.

The group textual representations may be identified as a valid and/orinvalid word groupings based on the listed rules and permutations ofpossible word groupings, where the element rules includes mathematicalrepresentation grouping rules. As another example, of a plurality ofpossible permutations of word groups of the matched elements, theprocessing module identifies a subset of the most identified word groupswhere the group graphical representation information compares favorablyto valid mathematical representations in accordance with themathematical representations grouping rules of the element rules.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 17A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of a contentingestion module within a computing system that includes the elementidentification module 302 of FIG. 5E and the interpretation module 304of FIG. 5E. The element identification module 302 includes the elementmatching module 400 of FIG. 6A and the element grouping module 402 ofFIG. 6A. The interpretation module 304 includes the grouping matchingmodule 404 of FIG. 6A and the grouping interpretation module 406 of FIG.6A. Generally, an embodiment of the invention presents solutions wherethe computing system 10 supports facilitating subsequent rapid phrasedetection.

In an example of operation of the facilitating of the subsequent rapidphrase detection, the element matching module 400 and interpretsformatted content 314 to produce matched elements 412. The matchedelements 412 includes a workgroup of a group of known words. Thegenerating includes matching a received element to an element of anelement list 332. The element list 332 further includes identificationof known words and one or more identigens per word. The matched elements412 further includes an identifier of each matched element.

The element grouping module 402 analyzes the matched elements 412 inaccordance with element rules 318, that further includes word grouprules, to produce identified element information 341. A favorable wordgrouping is associated with the matched elements in accordance with theelement rules 318 producing interim grouping information 950. Theinterim grouping information 950 includes identity of valid words of theword grouping based on lists and rules, permutations of possible wordgrouping meanings based on one or more of a predicted domain, anintermediate grouping, an adjective skipping rule, a source of content atopic, a pending question, etc.

The grouping matching module 404 analyzes the identified elementinformation 340 and the interim grouping information 950 in accordancewith the groupings list 334 to produce validated groupings information416 and a new grouping indicator 952. The new grouping indicator 952includes an entigen for each word of the word group. The producingincludes one or more of comparing a groupings aspect of the identifiedelement information 340 in light of the interim grouping information 950(e.g., for each permutation of groups of elements of possibleinterpretations). The producing further includes generating thevalidated groupings information 416 to include identification of validpermutations that align with the groupings list in light of the interimgrouping information 950 (e.g., eliminate invalid permutations rightaway when inconsistent with one or more of domain, context, etc.). Thegrouping matching module 404 further produces a new grouping indicator952 for the word group that does not have a single entigen assigned perthe groupings list 334.

The grouping interpretation module 406 interprets the validatedgroupings information 416 and the new grouping indicator 952 based onquestion information 346 and in accordance with interpretation rules 320to produce interpreted information 344 (e.g., most likelyinterpretations, next likely interpretations, etc.) and to produce a newentigen indicator 954. The new entigen indicator 954 includes words ofthe word group, entigens of the words, and a newly assigned entigen forthe group of entigens. The producing may be based on the plurality ofpossible meanings and a pruning of a plurality of possible meaningsbased on the interpretation rules 320 in light of other words of thevalidated groupings information 416 of the word group to produce ameaning and generating the new entigen when the word group as a validdeterministic meaning.

FIG. 17B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forfacilitating subsequent rapid phrase detection within a computingsystem. In particular, a method is presented for use in conjunction withone or more functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS.1-8D, 17A, and also FIG. 17B. The method includes step 960 where aprocessing module of one or more processing modules of one or morecomputing devices of the computing system interprets formatted contentto produce matched elements, where the matched elements include a wordgroup of a group of known words. The generating includes matching areceived element to an element of an element list, where the elementlist further includes identification of known words and one or moreidentigens per word, and outputting the matched elements to include anidentifier of each matched element.

The method continues at step 962 where the processing module analyzesthe matched elements in accordance with element rules to produceidentified element information and interim grouping information whenfavorable word grouping is associated with the matched elements inaccordance with element rules. For example, the processing moduleidentifies valid words of the word grouping based on the element rulesand the element list to produce the interim grouping information toinclude the identified valid words based on one or more of a predicteddomain, an intermediate grouping, an adjective skipping rule, a sourcetopic, a pending question, etc. As another example, the processingmodule compares matched elements with word group rules of the elementrules to extract possible word group meetings from the element rules andidentifies the words of the word group and for each word, identifiescandidate identigens. At least one identigen is also an entigen when theassociated word is considered a part of the word group.

The method continues at step 964 where the processing module analyzesthe identified element information and the interim grouping informationin accordance with a groupings list to produce validated groupingsinformation and a new grouping indicator. The new grouping indicatorincludes an entigen for each word of the word group. The analyzingincludes comparing a groupings aspect of the identified elementinformation in light of the grouping information (e.g., for eachpermutation of groups of elements of possible interpretations).

The analyzing further includes generating the validated groupingsinformation to include identification of valid permutations that alignwith the groupings list in light of the interim grouping information(e.g., eliminate invalid permutations right away that are inconsistentwith one or more of domain, context, etc.). The processing modulefurther produces a new grouping indicator for the word group that doesnot have a single entigen assigned per the groupings list.

The method continues at step 966 where the processing module interpretsthe validated groupings information and the new grouping indicator inaccordance with interpretation rules to produce interpreted informationand a new entigen indicator. The new entigen indicator includes a groupof entigens of the words of the word group and a newly assigned entigenfor the group of entigens. The producing includes, based on theplurality of possible meanings, pruning a plurality of possible meaningsbased on the interpretation rules in light of other words of thevalidated groupings information of the word group to produce a meaningand generating the new entigen when the word group as a validdeterministic meaning.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

FIG. 18A is a schematic block diagram of another embodiment of aninterpretation module within a computing system that includes theelement identification module 302 of FIG. 5E and the interpretationmodule 304 of FIG. 5E. The element identification module 302 includesthe element matching module 400 of FIG. 6A and the element groupingmodule 402 of FIG. 6A. The interpretation module 304 includes thegrouping matching module 404 of FIG. 6A and the grouping interpretationmodule 406 of FIG. 6A. Generally, an embodiment of the inventionpresents solutions where the computing system 10 supports representing aBoolean expression.

In an example of operation of the representing of the Booleanexpression, the element matching module 400 interprets formatted content314 to produce matched elements 412, where the matched elements 412includes a Boolean expression of known words. The generating includesmatching a received element to an element of an element list 332, wherethe element list 332 further includes identification of known words ofBoolean expressions and one or more identigens per word, and outputtingthe matched elements 412 to includes an identifier of each matchedelement.

The element grouping module 402 analyzes the matched elements 412 inaccordance with element rules 318. The element rules 318 further includeword Boolean structure rules. The element grouping module 402 producesidentified element information 340 when a favorable word grouping isassociated with the matched elements 412 in accordance with elementrules 318. The element grouping module 402 produces interim Booleaninformation 970 (e.g., identity of valid words of the Booleanexpressions based on lists and rules, permutations of possible Booleanmeanings based on one or more of a predicted domain, an intermediategrouping, an adjective skipping rule, a source topic, a pendingquestion, etc.). The analyzing further includes comparing the matchedelements 412 with Boolean structure rules of the element rules 318,extracting possible Boolean meanings from the element rules 318, andidentifying the words of the Boolean expression and identigens for eachword.

The grouping matching module 404 analyzes the identified elementinformation 340 and the interim Boolean information 970 in accordancewith a groupings list 334 to produce validated groupings information 416and Boolean candidate information 972. The Boolean candidate information972 includes a subset of possible Boolean structures and may furtherinclude an entigen for each word of the Boolean expression. Theproducing includes comparing a groupings aspect of the identifiedelement information 340 in light of the interim Boolean information 970(e.g., for each permutation of groups of elements of possible Booleanstructures).

The producing further includes generating the validated groupingsinformation 416 to include identification of valid permutations thatalign with the groupings list in light of the interim Booleaninformation 970 (e.g., eliminate invalid permutations right away thatare inconsistent with one or more of domain, context, etc.). Thegrouping matching module 404 further produces the Boolean candidateinformation 972 for a minimal number of Boolean expressions that aremost likely for the groupings list 334.

The grouping interpretation module 406 interprets the validatedgroupings information 416 and the Boolean candidate information 972based on question information 346 (e.g., operator input, crowdsourcinginput, etc.) and in accordance with interpretation rules 320 to produceinterpreted information 344 (e.g., most likely interpretations, nextlikely interpretations, etc.) and to produce Boolean information 974.The Boolean information 974 includes words of the Boolean expression,entigens of the words, an entigen assigned to a group of entigens of anexpression, interpretation information, inference information, anddeduction information. The producing may be based on a plurality ofpossible meanings where a pruning of the plurality of possible meaningsis based on the interpretation rules 320 in light of other words of thevalidated groupings information 416 of the word group to produce aBoolean expression meaning and may further include generation ofinferences and deductions.

FIG. 18B is a logic diagram of an embodiment of a method forrepresenting a boolean expression within a computing system. Inparticular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one ormore functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-8D,18A, and also FIG. 18B. The method includes step 990 where a processingmodule of one or more processing modules of one or more computingdevices of the computing system interprets formatted content to producematched elements, where the matched elements include a Booleanexpression of known words. The generating includes matching a receivedelement to an element of an element list, where the element list furtherincludes identification of known words of Boolean expressions and one ormore identigens per word. The generating further includes outputting thematched elements to include an identifier of each matched element.

The method continues at step 992 where the processing module analyzesthe matched elements in accordance with Boolean structure rules toproduce identified element information and interim Boolean information.The analyzing includes using the Boolean structure rules to extractpossible Boolean meanings from the matched elements to produce theinterim Boolean information.

The method continues at step 994 where the processing module analyzesthe identified element information and the interim Boolean informationin accordance with a groupings list to produce validated groupingsinformation and Boolean candidate information, where the Booleancandidate information includes a subset of possible Boolean structures.The analyzing includes using the Boolean structure rules to extractpossible Boolean meanings from the matched elements to produce theinterim Boolean information and to further identify possible Booleanstructures and entigens for one or more words of the Boolean expression.Alternatively, or in addition to, the processing module compares agrouping aspect of the identified element information in light of theinterim Boolean information (e.g., for each permutation of groups ofelements of possible Boolean structures).

The processing module generates the validated groupings information toinclude identification of valid permutations that align with thegroupings list in light of the interim Boolean information (e.g.,eliminate invalid permutations right away that are inconsistent with oneor more of domain, context, etc.). The processing module may furtherproduce the Boolean candidate information for a minimal number ofBoolean expressions that are most likely in accordance with thegroupings list.

The method continues at step 996 where the processing module interpretsthe validated groupings information and the Boolean candidateinformation in accordance with Boolean interpretation rules to produceinterpreted information and Boolean information. The Boolean informationincludes one or more of words of the Boolean expression, entigens of thewords, an entigen assigned to a group of entigens of the expression,interpretation information, inference information, and deductioninformation. For example, the processing module produces, based on theplurality of possible meanings, a pruning of a plurality of possiblemeanings based on the Boolean interpretation rules in light of otherwords of the validated groupings information of the word group toproduce a Boolean expression meaning, inferences, and deductions.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module canalternatively be performed by other modules of the computing system 10of FIG. 1 or by other devices. In addition, at least one memory section(e.g., a computer readable memory, a non-transitory computer readablestorage medium, a non-transitory computer readable memory organized intoa first memory element, a second memory element, a third memory element,a fourth element section, a fifth memory element etc.) that storesoperational instructions can, when executed by one or more processingmodules of one or more computing devices (e.g., one or more servers, oneor more user devices) of the computing system 10, cause the one or morecomputing devices to perform any or all of the method steps describedabove.

It is noted that terminologies as may be used herein such as bit stream,stream, signal sequence, etc. (or their equivalents) have been usedinterchangeably to describe digital information whose contentcorresponds to any of a number of desired types (e.g., data, video,speech, audio, etc. any of which may generally be referred to as‘data’).

As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately”provides an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding termand/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted toleranceranges from less than one percent to fifty percent and corresponds to,but is not limited to, component values, integrated circuit processvariations, temperature variations, rise and fall times, and/or thermalnoise. Such relativity between items ranges from a difference of a fewpercent to magnitude differences. As may also be used herein, theterm(s) “configured to”, “operably coupled to”, “coupled to”, and/or“coupling” includes direct coupling between items and/or indirectcoupling between items via an intervening item (e.g., an item includes,but is not limited to, a component, an element, a circuit, and/or amodule) where, for an example of indirect coupling, the intervening itemdoes not modify the information of a signal but may adjust its currentlevel, voltage level, and/or power level. As may further be used herein,inferred coupling (i.e., where one element is coupled to another elementby inference) includes direct and indirect coupling between two items inthe same manner as “coupled to”. As may even further be used herein, theterm “configured to”, “operable to”, “coupled to”, or “operably coupledto” indicates that an item includes one or more of power connections,input(s), output(s), etc., to perform, when activated, one or more itscorresponding functions and may further include inferred coupling to oneor more other items. As may still further be used herein, the term“associated with”, includes direct and/or indirect coupling of separateitems and/or one item being embedded within another item.

As may be used herein, the term “compares favorably”, indicates that acomparison between two or more items, signals, etc., provides a desiredrelationship. For example, when the desired relationship is that signal1 has a greater magnitude than signal 2, a favorable comparison may beachieved when the magnitude of signal 1 is greater than that of signal 2or when the magnitude of signal 2 is less than that of signal 1. As maybe used herein, the term “compares unfavorably”, indicates that acomparison between two or more items, signals, etc., fails to providethe desired relationship.

As may also be used herein, the terms “processing module”, “processingcircuit”, “processor”, and/or “processing unit” may be a singleprocessing device or a plurality of processing devices. Such aprocessing device may be a microprocessor, micro-controller, digitalsignal processor, microcomputer, central processing unit, fieldprogrammable gate array, programmable logic device, state machine, logiccircuitry, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or any device thatmanipulates signals (analog and/or digital) based on hard coding of thecircuitry and/or operational instructions. The processing module,module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit may be, or furtherinclude, memory and/or an integrated memory element, which may be asingle memory device, a plurality of memory devices, and/or embeddedcircuitry of another processing module, module, processing circuit,and/or processing unit. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory,random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, staticmemory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any devicethat stores digital information. Note that if the processing module,module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit includes more thanone processing device, the processing devices may be centrally located(e.g., directly coupled together via a wired and/or wireless busstructure) or may be distributedly located (e.g., cloud computing viaindirect coupling via a local area network and/or a wide area network).Further note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit,and/or processing unit implements one or more of its functions via astate machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logiccircuitry, the memory and/or memory element storing the correspondingoperational instructions may be embedded within, or external to, thecircuitry comprising the state machine, analog circuitry, digitalcircuitry, and/or logic circuitry. Still further note that, the memoryelement may store, and the processing module, module, processingcircuit, and/or processing unit executes, hard coded and/or operationalinstructions corresponding to at least some of the steps and/orfunctions illustrated in one or more of the Figures. Such a memorydevice or memory element can be included in an article of manufacture.

One or more embodiments have been described above with the aid of methodsteps illustrating the performance of specified functions andrelationships thereof. The boundaries and sequence of these functionalbuilding blocks and method steps have been arbitrarily defined hereinfor convenience of description. Alternate boundaries and sequences canbe defined so long as the specified functions and relationships areappropriately performed. Any such alternate boundaries or sequences arethus within the scope and spirit of the claims. Further, the boundariesof these functional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined forconvenience of description. Alternate boundaries could be defined aslong as the certain significant functions are appropriately performed.Similarly, flow diagram blocks may also have been arbitrarily definedherein to illustrate certain significant functionality.

To the extent used, the flow diagram block boundaries and sequence couldhave been defined otherwise and still perform the certain significantfunctionality. Such alternate definitions of both functional buildingblocks and flow diagram blocks and sequences are thus within the scopeand spirit of the claims. One of average skill in the art will alsorecognize that the functional building blocks, and other illustrativeblocks, modules and components herein, can be implemented as illustratedor by discrete components, application specific integrated circuits,processors executing appropriate software and the like or anycombination thereof.

In addition, a flow diagram may include a “start” and/or “continue”indication. The “start” and “continue” indications reflect that thesteps presented can optionally be incorporated in or otherwise used inconjunction with other routines. In this context, “start” indicates thebeginning of the first step presented and may be preceded by otheractivities not specifically shown. Further, the “continue” indicationreflects that the steps presented may be performed multiple times and/ormay be succeeded by other activities not specifically shown. Further,while a flow diagram indicates a particular ordering of steps, otherorderings are likewise possible provided that the principles ofcausality are maintained.

The one or more embodiments are used herein to illustrate one or moreaspects, one or more features, one or more concepts, and/or one or moreexamples. A physical embodiment of an apparatus, an article ofmanufacture, a machine, and/or of a process may include one or more ofthe aspects, features, concepts, examples, etc. described with referenceto one or more of the embodiments discussed herein. Further, from figureto figure, the embodiments may incorporate the same or similarly namedfunctions, steps, modules, etc. that may use the same or differentreference numbers and, as such, the functions, steps, modules, etc. maybe the same or similar functions, steps, modules, etc. or differentones.

Unless specifically stated to the contra, signals to, from, and/orbetween elements in a figure of any of the figures presented herein maybe analog or digital, continuous time or discrete time, and single-endedor differential. For instance, if a signal path is shown as asingle-ended path, it also represents a differential signal path.Similarly, if a signal path is shown as a differential path, it alsorepresents a single-ended signal path. While one or more particulararchitectures are described herein, other architectures can likewise beimplemented that use one or more data buses not expressly shown, directconnectivity between elements, and/or indirect coupling between otherelements as recognized by one of average skill in the art.

The term “module” is used in the description of one or more of theembodiments. A module implements one or more functions via a device suchas a processor or other processing device or other hardware that mayinclude or operate in association with a memory that stores operationalinstructions. A module may operate independently and/or in conjunctionwith software and/or firmware. As also used herein, a module may containone or more sub-modules, each of which may be one or more modules.

As may further be used herein, a computer readable memory includes oneor more memory elements. A memory element may be a separate memorydevice, multiple memory devices, or a set of memory locations within amemory device. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, randomaccess memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory,dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device thatstores digital information. The memory device may be in a form a solidstate memory, a hard drive memory, cloud memory, thumb drive, servermemory, computing device memory, and/or other physical medium forstoring digital information.

While particular combinations of various functions and features of theone or more embodiments have been expressly described herein, othercombinations of these features and functions are likewise possible. Thepresent disclosure is not limited by the particular examples disclosedherein and expressly incorporates these other combinations.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for execution by a computing device, themethod comprises: obtaining a string of words; determining whether twoor more words of the string of words are in a word group, wherein theword group is unassociated with a single entigen that represents a validdeterministic meaning of the word group; and when the two or more wordsare in the word group: determining a set of identigens for each word ofthe word group to produce a plurality of sets of identigens, wherein aset of identigens of the plurality of sets of identigens represents oneor more different meanings of a word of the word group, wherein a firstset of identigens of the plurality of sets of identigens is produced fora first word of the word group, wherein each identigen of the first setof identigens represents a different meaning of the first word,interpreting, in accordance with identigen pairing rules, the pluralityof sets of identigens to produce an entigen group, wherein the entigengroup represents a most likely meaning interpretation of the word group,wherein an entigen of the entigen group corresponds to a selectedidentigen of the set identigens having a selected meaning of the one ormore different meanings of the word, wherein each entigen of the entigengroup represents a single conceivable and perceivable thing in space andtime that is independent of language, wherein the selected identigenfavorably pairs with at least one corresponding sequentially adjacentidentigen of another set of identigens of the plurality of sets ofidentigens in accordance with identigen pairing rules, and assigning asingle new entigen to represent the entigen group, wherein the singlenew entigen represents the valid deterministic meaning of the wordgroup, and wherein the single new entigen is subsequently utilized tointerpret a query that includes the word group.
 2. The method of claim 1further comprises one or more of: generating a representation of thestring of words utilizing the single new entigen; updating a knowledgedatabase to include an association between the single new entigen andthe entigen group; and interpreting, utilizing the single new entigen,another string of words of the query that includes the word group toproduce a most likely meaning interpretation of the other string ofwords.
 3. The method of claim 1 further comprises one or more of:determining a set of remaining word identigens for a remaining word ofthe string of words, wherein the set of remaining word identigensrepresents one or more different meanings of the remaining word of thestring of words; interpreting, in accordance with entigen pairing rules,the set of remaining word identigens and the entigen group to produce anexpanded entigen group, wherein the expanded entigen group represents amost likely meaning interpretation of the string of words, wherein anentigen of the expanded entigen group corresponds to a selectedidentigen of the set of remaining word identigens having a selectedmeaning of the one or more different meanings of the remaining word ofthe string of words, wherein each entigen of the expanded entigen grouprepresents a single conceivable and perceivable thing in space and timethat is independent of language, wherein the selected identigen of theset of remaining word identigens favorably pairs with at least onecorresponding sequentially adjacent entigen of the entigen group inaccordance with the entigen pairing rules; and assigning a second singlenew entigen to represent the expanded entigen group, wherein the secondsingle new entigen represents the most likely meaning interpretation ofthe string of words.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determiningwhether two or more words of the string of words are in a word groupcomprises: detecting that a first word of the two or more words of thestring of words matches a first entry word of one or more word groupentries of a word group list, wherein each word group entry of the wordgroup list includes two or more entry words and an entry set of wordgroup identigens that corresponds to interpretations of the two or moreentry words, wherein the two or more entry words of each of the one ormore word group entries includes the first entry word; determining, forat least some of the one or more word group entries, whether remainingwords of the of the two or more words of the string of words matchremaining entry words of the two or more entry words; and when theremaining words of the of the two or more words of the string of wordsmatch the remaining entry words of the two or more entry words of amatching word group entry of the at least some of the one or more wordgroup entries, indicating that the two or more words of the string ofwords are in the word group.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein thedetermining whether two or more words of the string of words are in aword group further comprises: comparing the two or more words of thestring of words to a word group entry of a word group list, wherein theword group entry of the word group list includes two or more entry wordsand an entry set of word group identigens that corresponds to potentialinterpretations of the two or more entry words; and indicating that thetwo or more words of the string of words are in the word group when thetwo or more words of the string of words compare favorably to the two ormore entry words of the word group entry of the word group list.
 6. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the assigning the single new entigen torepresent the entigen group comprises: generating a new entigenindicator, wherein the new entigen indicator uniquely identifies acombination of each entigen of the entigen group; and establishinglinkage between the new entigen indicator and each entigen of theentigen group.
 7. A computing device of a computing system, thecomputing device comprises: an interface; a local memory; and aprocessing module operably coupled to the interface and the localmemory, wherein the processing module functions to: obtain, via theinterface, a string of words; determine whether two or more words of thestring of words are in a word group, wherein the word group isunassociated with a single entigen that represents a valid deterministicmeaning of the word group; and when the two or more words are in theword group: determine a set of identigens for each word of the wordgroup to produce a plurality of sets of identigens, wherein a set ofidentigens of the plurality of sets of identigens represents one or moredifferent meanings of a word of the word group, wherein a first set ofidentigens of the plurality of sets of identigens is produced for afirst word of the word group, wherein each identigen of the first set ofidentigens represents a different meaning of the first word, interpret,in accordance with identigen pairing rules, the plurality of sets ofidentigens to produce an entigen group, wherein the entigen grouprepresents a most likely meaning interpretation of the word group,wherein an entigen of the entigen group corresponds to a selectedidentigen of the set identigens having a selected meaning of the one ormore different meanings of the word, wherein each entigen of the entigengroup represents a single conceivable and perceivable thing in space andtime that is independent of language, wherein the selected identigenfavorably pairs with at least one corresponding sequentially adjacentidentigen of another set of identigens of the plurality of sets ofidentigens in accordance with identigen pairing rules, and assign asingle new entigen to represent the entigen group, wherein the singlenew entigen represents the valid deterministic meaning of the wordgroup, and wherein the single new entigen is subsequently utilized tointerpret a query that includes the word group.
 8. The computing deviceof claim 7, wherein the processing module further functions to: generatea representation of the string of words utilizing the single newentigen; update, via the interface, a knowledge database to include anassociation between the single new entigen and the entigen group; andinterpret, utilizing the single new entigen, another string of words ofthe query that includes the word group to produce a most likely meaninginterpretation of the other string of words.
 9. The computing device ofclaim 7, wherein the processing module further functions to: determine aset of remaining word identigens for a remaining word of the string ofwords, wherein the set of remaining word identigens represents one ormore different meanings of the remaining word of the string of words;interpret, in accordance with entigen pairing rules, the set ofremaining word identigens and the entigen group to produce an expandedentigen group, wherein the expanded entigen group represents a mostlikely meaning interpretation of the string of words, wherein an entigenof the expanded entigen group corresponds to a selected identigen of theset of remaining word identigens having a selected meaning of the one ormore different meanings of the remaining word of the string of words,wherein each entigen of the expanded entigen group represents a singleconceivable and perceivable thing in space and time that is independentof language, wherein the selected identigen of the set of remaining wordidentigens favorably pairs with at least one corresponding sequentiallyadjacent entigen of the entigen group in accordance with the entigenpairing rules; and assign a second single new entigen to represent theexpanded entigen group, wherein the second single new entigen representsthe most likely meaning interpretation of the string of words.
 10. Thecomputing device of claim 7, wherein the processing module functions todetermine whether two or more words of the string of words are in a wordgroup by: detecting that a first word of the two or more words of thestring of words matches a first entry word of one or more word groupentries of a word group list, wherein each word group entry of the wordgroup list includes two or more entry words and an entry set of wordgroup identigens that corresponds to interpretations of the two or moreentry words, wherein the two or more entry words of each of the one ormore word group entries includes the first entry word; determining, forat least some of the one or more word group entries, whether remainingwords of the of the two or more words of the string of words matchremaining entry words of the two or more entry words; and when theremaining words of the of the two or more words of the string of wordsmatch the remaining entry words of the two or more entry words of amatching word group entry of the at least some of the one or more wordgroup entries, indicating that the two or more words of the string ofwords are in the word group.
 11. The computing device of claim 7,wherein the processing module further functions to determine whether twoor more words of the string of words are in a word group by: comparingthe two or more words of the string of words to a word group entry of aword group list, wherein the word group entry of the word group listincludes two or more entry words and an entry set of word groupidentigens that corresponds to potential interpretations of the two ormore entry words; and indicating that the two or more words of thestring of words are in the word group when the two or more words of thestring of words compare favorably to the two or more entry words of theword group entry of the word group list.
 12. The computing device ofclaim 7, wherein the processing module functions to assign the singlenew entigen to represent the entigen group by: generating a new entigenindicator, wherein the new entigen indicator uniquely identifies acombination of each entigen of the entigen group; and establishinglinkage between the new entigen indicator and each entigen of theentigen group.
 13. A computer readable memory comprises: a first memoryelement that stores operational instructions that, when executed by aprocessing module, causes the processing module to: obtain a string ofwords; and determine whether two or more words of the string of wordsare in a word group, wherein the word group is unassociated with asingle entigen that represents a valid deterministic meaning of the wordgroup; and a second memory element that stores operational instructionsthat, when executed by the processing module, causes the processingmodule to: when the two or more words are in the word group: determine aset of identigens for each word of the word group to produce a pluralityof sets of identigens, wherein a set of identigens of the plurality ofsets of identigens represents one or more different meanings of a wordof the word group, wherein a first set of identigens of the plurality ofsets of identigens is produced for a first word of the word group,wherein each identigen of the first set of identigens represents adifferent meaning of the first word, interpret, in accordance withidentigen pairing rules, the plurality of sets of identigens to producean entigen group, wherein the entigen group represents a most likelymeaning interpretation of the word group, wherein an entigen of theentigen group corresponds to a selected identigen of the set identigenshaving a selected meaning of the one or more different meanings of theword, wherein each entigen of the entigen group represents a singleconceivable and perceivable thing in space and time that is independentof language, wherein the selected identigen favorably pairs with atleast one corresponding sequentially adjacent identigen of another setof identigens of the plurality of sets of identigens in accordance withidentigen pairing rules, and assign a single new entigen to representthe entigen group, wherein the single new entigen represents the validdeterministic meaning of the word group, and wherein the single newentigen is subsequently utilized to interpret a query that includes theword group.
 14. The computer readable memory of claim 13 furthercomprises: a third memory element that stores operational instructionsthat, when executed by the processing module, causes the processingmodule to: generate a representation of the string of words utilizingthe single new entigen; update a knowledge database to include anassociation between the single new entigen and the entigen group; andinterpret, utilizing the single new entigen, another string of words ofthe query that includes the word group to produce a most likely meaninginterpretation of the other string of words.
 15. The computer readablememory of claim 13 further comprises: a fourth memory element thatstores operational instructions that, when executed by the processingmodule, causes the processing module to: determine a set of remainingword identigens for a remaining word of the string of words, wherein theset of remaining word identigens represents one or more differentmeanings of the remaining word of the string of words; interpret, inaccordance with entigen pairing rules, the set of remaining wordidentigens and the entigen group to produce an expanded entigen group,wherein the expanded entigen group represents a most likely meaninginterpretation of the string of words, wherein an entigen of theexpanded entigen group corresponds to a selected identigen of the set ofremaining word identigens having a selected meaning of the one or moredifferent meanings of the remaining word of the string of words, whereineach entigen of the expanded entigen group represents a singleconceivable and perceivable thing in space and time that is independentof language, wherein the selected identigen of the set of remaining wordidentigens favorably pairs with at least one corresponding sequentiallyadjacent entigen of the entigen group in accordance with the entigenpairing rules; and assign a second single new entigen to represent theexpanded entigen group, wherein the second single new entigen representsthe most likely meaning interpretation of the string of words.
 16. Thecomputer readable memory of claim 13, wherein the processing modulefunctions to execute the operational instructions stored by the firstmemory element to cause the processing module to determine whether twoor more words of the string of words are in a word group by: detectingthat a first word of the two or more words of the string of wordsmatches a first entry word of one or more word group entries of a wordgroup list, wherein each word group entry of the word group listincludes two or more entry words and an entry set of word groupidentigens that corresponds to interpretations of the two or more entrywords, wherein the two or more entry words of each of the one or moreword group entries includes the first entry word; determining, for atleast some of the one or more word group entries, whether remainingwords of the of the two or more words of the string of words matchremaining entry words of the two or more entry words; and when theremaining words of the of the two or more words of the string of wordsmatch the remaining entry words of the two or more entry words of amatching word group entry of the at least some of the one or more wordgroup entries, indicating that the two or more words of the string ofwords are in the word group.
 17. The computer readable memory of claim13, wherein the processing module further functions to execute theoperational instructions stored by the first memory element to furthercause the processing module to determine whether two or more words ofthe string of words are in a word group by: comparing the two or morewords of the string of words to a word group entry of a word group list,wherein the word group entry of the word group list includes two or moreentry words and an entry set of word group identigens that correspondsto potential interpretations of the two or more entry words; andindicating that the two or more words of the string of words are in theword group when the two or more words of the string of words comparefavorably to the two or more entry words of the word group entry of theword group list.
 18. The computer readable memory of claim 13, whereinthe processing module functions to execute the operational instructionsstored by the second memory element to cause the processing module toassign the single new entigen to represent the entigen group by:generating a new entigen indicator, wherein the new entigen indicatoruniquely identifies a combination of each entigen of the entigen group;and establishing linkage between the new entigen indicator and eachentigen of the entigen group.